Wind, solar, and hydropower will generate the U.S. power supply

In 2022/2023, solar and wind are expected to add more than 60% of the utility-scale generating capacity to the U.S. power grid (46% from solar, 17% from wind). The United States is a resource-rich country with abundant renewable energy resources.

Renewables are on track to generate more power than coal in the United States this year. But the question is whether they can grow fast enough to meet the country’s climate goals.

Supply chain constraints and trade disputes have slowed wind and solar installations, raising questions about the United States' ability to meet the emission reductions sought by the Inflation Reduction Act. The Biden administration is banking on the landmark climate law cutting emissions by 40 percent below 2005 levels by 2030.

Many analysts think the United States will ultimately shake off the slowdown thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act's $369 billion in clean energy investments. But it may take time for the law’s impact to be felt. Tax guidance needs to be finalized before developers begin plunking down money on new facilities, and companies now face headwinds in the form of higher interest rates and the looming threat of a recession.

The Inflation Reduction Act's emission reductions hinge on the country’s ability to at least double the rate of renewable installations over the record levels observed in 2020 and 2021.

Assuming intermediate efficiency, solar photovoltaic (PV) modules covering 0.6% of the U.S. land area could meet national electricity demand. PV module prices have declined to an average of $0.27/watt. The U.S. manufactured 1% of PV cells and 3% of PV modules globally in 2020. In 2021, a new record high of over 23.6 GW of solar photovoltaic capacity was added in the U.S., raising the total installed capacity to over 121 GW. Solar accounted for 46% of the new generating capacity in 2021.

Hydrothermal resources, i.e., steam and hot water, are available primarily in the western U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii, yet geothermal heat pumps can be used almost anywhere to extract heat from the shallow ground, which stays at relatively constant temperatures year-round. Electricity generated from geothermal power plants is projected to increase from 15.9 billion kWh in 2021 to 47.4 billion kWh in 2050. Geothermal electricity generation has the potential to exceed 500 GW, which is half of the current U.S. capacity.

U.S. onshore wind resources have a potential capacity of almost 11,000 GW and a current installed capacity of 132.7 GW. Offshore wind resources are potentially 4,200 GW, the current capacity is 42 MW, and the development pipeline contained over 28 GW of projects in 2019. Over 16 GW of wind capacity was installed in the U.S. in 2020, an 85% increase from 2019. The federal production tax credit (PTC) significantly influences wind development, but cycles of enactment and expiration lead to year-to-year changes in investment. In 2020, the PTC was extended to allow wind projects beginning construction in 2020 or 2021 a PTC at 1.5¢/kWh for 10 years of electricity output. Based on the average U.S. electricity fuel mix, a 1.82 MW wind turbine (U.S. average in 2019) can displace 3,679 metric tons of CO2 emissions per year. By 2050, 404 GW of wind capacity would meet an estimated 35% of U.S. electricity demand and result in 12.3 gigatonnes of avoided CO2 emissions, a 14% reduction when compared to 2013.

In the U.S., net electricity generation from conventional hydropower peaked in 1997 at 356 TWh/yr. Currently, the U.S. gets about 260 TWh/yr of electricity from hydropower. While electricity generated from hydropower is virtually emission-free, significant levels of methane and CO2 may be emitted through the decomposition of vegetation in the reservoir. Other environmental concerns include fish injury and mortality, habitat degradation, and water quality impairment. “Fish-friendly” turbines and smaller dams help mitigate some of these problems.

Wood—mostly as pulp, paper, and paperboard industry waste products—accounts for 43% of total biomass energy consumption. Waste—municipal solid waste, landfill gas, sludge, tires, and agricultural by-products—accounts for an additional 9%. Biomass has low net CO2 emissions compared to fossil fuels. At combustion, it releases CO2 previously removed from the atmosphere. Further emissions are associated with the processing and growth of biomass, which can require large areas of land. Willow biomass requires 121 acres of land to generate one GWh of electricity per year, more land than other renewable sources.

For now, U.S. renewable output is edging higher. Wind and solar output are up 18 percent through Nov. 20 compared to the same time last year and have grown 58 percent compared to 2019, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The government energy tracker predicts that wind, solar and hydro will generate 22 percent of U.S. electricity by the end of this year. That is more than coal at 20 percent and nuclear at 19 percent.

Renewable output also exceeded coal in 2020, though that year saw a decrease in energy generation across the board due to the economic lockdowns associated with the Covid-19 pandemic.

Wind and solar growth have to continue at a blistering pace to meet the United States' climate targets. Researchers at Princeton University estimate the country needs to install about 50 gigawatts of wind and solar annually between 2022 and 2024, or roughly double the 25 GW that the United States installed annually in 2020 and 2021.

Reforma kalendara / Posjeduj svoje vlastito vrijeme

Uvođenje gregorijanskog kalendara, čovječanstvo je izgubilo svoju zadnju nit povezanosti sa Svemirom i prirodnim ritmom. Čovječanstvo je od tog reza potpuno skrenulo poglede s mjeseca, zvijezda i pogleda u sebe te ih fokusiralo na materiju, novac i sveprisutne satove i kalendare, zaboravljajući pritom svoju istinsku misiju u najboljem smislu te riječi. Ta je činjenica bila glavna pokretačka misao vodilja Jose Arguellesa kada je nakon više desetljeća proučavanja mayanskog znanja uobličio sustav koji je nazvao Zakon vremena.

Naravno, treba reći, nije Jose Arguelles jedini koji se bavio 13-tim mjesecom. 13-mjesečni kalendar osmislio je i prije Auguste Comte 1849. godine. Temeljio se na godini od 364 dana koja je uključivala jedan ili dva "prazna" dana što je Abbé Mastrofini, talijanski rimokatolički svećenik, osmislio 15 godina prije. Svaki od 13 mjeseci imao je 28 dana i točno četiri tjedna.

Međutim, ovaj "pozitivistički" kalendar bio je toliko opterećen imenima istaknutih muškaraca i žena od antičkih do modernih vremena da je dobio hladan odgovor. Otprilike početkom dvadesetog stoljeća, plan je ponovno oživio Moses B. Cotsworth koji je eliminirao suvišna imena, čime je plan pojednostavio. Novi trinaesti mjesec označen je kao "Sol".

Ovaj vječni kalendar, u Sjedinjenim Državama poznatiji kao Eastmanov plan, naišao je na dobar prijem među mnogim Amerikancima. Bio je to najracionalniji plan koji su poznavali (prije nego što je Udruga Svjetskog kalendara krajem 1930. lansirala Svjetski kalendarski plan) i stoga ga je podržao popriličan broj istaknutih poslovnih ljudi, statističara i računovođa. 13-mjesečni kalendar prihvaćen je zbog svoje naizgled jednostavnosti i toliko željene stabilnosti. Javnost, međutim, nije blagonaklono prihvatila jer su promjene bile previše drastične. Slijedi nekoliko promjena:

Kalendar od 13 mjeseci nije bio lako djeljiv. Prvo tromjesečje godine uvijek bi završavalo 7. travnja, a drugo bi tromjesečje započinjalo 8. travnja. Polugodište bi počinjalo 15. dana u novom mjesecu, Sol, a posljednje bi tromjesečje počinjalo 22. rujna. Ovaj aranžman davao je na svako tromjesečje tri mjeseca i jedan tjedan, ili tri i jedna četvrtina mjeseca, uzrokujući frakcijske mjesece. Sama ta činjenica izazvala bi neugodnosti za sve djelatnosti i poslove koji se temelje na tromjesečnim godinama.

Druga značajka, na koju se u Sjedinjenim Državama gledalo s nemilošću, bila je promjena poznatih datuma kao što je 4. srpnja, koji je postao 17. Sol.

Nakon što su se godinama uzaludno borili za prihvaćanje 13-mjesečnog kalendara, pod vještim vodstvom Georgea Eastmana u Sjedinjenim Državama i Mosesa B. Cotswortha u Engleskoj, Međunarodna liga fiksnog kalendara, s uredima u Londonu, Engleska, i u Rochesteru, New York, tiho je zatvorio svoja vrata oko 1937. i aktivnosti su prestale. Velika šteta za sve nas.

Vrijeme nije mjera trajanja nekog događaja, vrijeme nisu sati i minute. Vrijeme je frekvencija – univerzalna frekvencija sinkronizacije koja omogućuje harmoniju svih ciklusa u svemiru. Vrijeme nije linearno, niti kružno, ono ima spiralnu formu. Vrijeme je fraktalno. Radijalno se širi u svim pravcima. Vrijeme je beskonačno konačno. Vrijeme ne možemo percipirati svojim osjetilima, kao prostor, koji možemo dotaknuti i osjetiti, i koji opisujemo dužinom, širinom i visinom. Vrijeme spoznajemo svojim umom i ono je povezano s našim mislima. Znamo da one ne poznaju fizičke barijere i da za njih ne vrijede pravila materijalnog svijeta. Zato kažemo da su naše misli i naš um, pa tako i vrijeme, smješteni u jednu višu - četvrtu dimenziju.

Praktičnu, pak, primjenu tog Zakona u svakodnevnom životu predstavlja "Sinkronar 13 luna 28 dana", što je naziv za kalendar koji je Arguelles ponudio svijetu kao vrhunsko rješenje bijega iz te neusklađenosti s prirodnim ritmom. Cijeli kalendar naziva se Sinkronarom, jer ima funkciju sinkronizacije s prirodom te biološkim i galaktičkim ciklusom.

Ako vam je ovo smijurija i ne prihvaćate ovakve poglede na svijet oko sebe, vrijeme je da ipak odete na svoj TikTok, Insta ili Face profil i nastavite živjeti svoje uobičajne živote. Ako želite dalje kopati, idemo...

Kao što je zrak atmosfera tijela, tako je vrijeme atmosfera uma. Ako se vrijeme u kojem živimo sastoji od nepravilnih dana i mjeseci, regulirano mehaniziranim minutama i satima, naša svijest se pretvara u mehaniziranu nepravilnost. Budući da sve potječe od uma, ne treba se čuditi što je atmosfera u kojoj živimo svakim danom sve zagađenija, dok se istovremeno svi žale da nemaju dovoljno vremena. Tko posjeduje tvoje vrijeme – posjeduje tvoj um.

Arguelles tvrdi da je kaotični doživljaj vremena koji nam je nametnut gregorijanskim kalendarom uzrok potiskivanju svima urođenih sposobnosti telepatije, intuicije i putovanja kroz vrijeme te da vrijeme, na taj način zarobljeno u sustavu 12:60 (12 mjeseci, 12 sati, 60 minuta), onemogućuje čovjekov daljnji razvoj, odnosno povezivanje s prirodom i drugim dimenzijama.

Sinkronar omogućuje ljudima da žive pravu prirodu vremena, u frekvenciji 13:20, prirodnoj frekvenciji Univerzuma, jer je to vječiti, harmonični račun galaktičkog vremena. Sinkronar, kaže dalje Zakon vremena, sadrži u sebi lunarni kod koji se bazira na prosječnom kretanju Mjeseca oko Zemlje, kao i na prirodnom ciklusu. Svakodnevno mjerenje vremena, ono što ljudi zovu vrijeme i sati, ili, možemo reći, kalendarska dimenzija sinkronara, naziva se cikličnim redom i tako i izgleda – savršena simetrija i harmonija.

Dakle, mayanska godina po Sinkronaru 13 luna 28 dana sastoji se od trinaest mjeseci od kojih svaki ima 28 dana podijeljenih na 4 jednaka tjedna od 7 dana. Tih 13 potpuno jednakih mjeseci, potpuno jednaka 52 tjedna, daju 364 dana, a 365. potrebni dan za hvatanje ritma tropske godine je tzv. vanvremenski ili Zeleni dan koji se slavi 25. srpnja. Dan nakon toga, 26. srpnja, počinje Nova godina po Sinkronaru 13 luna.

Tada se Sunce u vrijeme izlaska diže zajedno s velikom zvijezdom Sirijus (to je bila i staroegipatska Nova godina ili helijakalni izlazak Sirijusa) i time ovaj Sinkronar, kažu oni koji svakodnevno žive po njemu, postaje alat galaktičke sinkronizacije što i jest javno izrečeni cilj Pokreta za mir i promjenu kalendara u Kalendar 13 luna: preusmjeravanje čovječanstva prema prirodnoj frekvenciji vremena 13:20, odnosno prema 13 luna sa 20 solarnih frekvencija.

Sinkronar 13 luna 28 dana je biološki kalendar koji je sinkroniziran sa Suncem, harmonijski je i u potpunoj rezonanciji s biosferom Zemlje i, što je najvažnije, u rezonanciji s frekvencijom koja ujedinjuje galaktički poredak – frekvencijom četvrte dimenzije koja je dimenzija vremena – podučava Zakon vremena.

Ako i dalje čitate i želite dalje kopati, idemo...

Za Maye vrijeme je faktor UNIVERZALNE SINKRONIZACIJE. Kalendar je matrica Vremena. Svrha kalendara je usklađivanje sa Vremenom – sinkronizirana organizacija života. Naš doživljaj vremena i način na koji ga pratimo imaju izniman utjecaj na naš život. Vrijeme i um su povezani. Prema Zakonu vremena vrijeme se, jednako kao i naš um, nalazi u četvrtoj dimenziji. Vrijeme je spona između 3. dimenzije vremena i 5. dimenzije vremena. Zakon Vremena i mayanske kodove Vremena je otkrio dr. José Argüelles / Valum Votan.

Zakon vremena je učenje o vremenu i njegovoj pravoj prirodi temeljeno na znanjima drevnih Maya.

Prema učenju Maya, vrijeme je spiralno, radijalno, fraktalno. Za Maye Vrijeme je frekvencija evolucije. Kroz specifičnu formu spirale uvijek je otvorena mogućnost napretka i prelaska na viši nivo, u najširem smislu, jer upravo spiralno kretanje omogućuje pomak prema naprijed. Vrijeme ima svojstva fraktala, odnosno i prošlost i sadašnjost i budućnost su povezani. Svojim djelovanjem sada možemo iscijeliti svoju prošlost i oblikovati budućnost. Maye su jedinicu vremena zvali Kin. Svaki kin ima svoje ime, svoju jedinstvenu energiju. Kin se sastoji od spoja Solarnog pečata i Galaktičkog tona. KIN je jedinična mjera koja se može prilagoditi bilo kojoj vrijednosti, može predstavljati jedan dan, jednu lunu (mjesec), jednu godinu, tun, katun, baktun... itd. U Sinkronaru 13 luna jedan dan odgovara jednom kinu.

Sinkronar 13 luna 28 dana 

 

Kalendar koji je objavio Zakon vremena, pod imenom Sinkronar 13 luna (mjeseci), objedinjuje i prati Vrijeme kroz dulje i kraće cikluse.

13 luna 28 dana je temeljen na kalendarima  Maya: svetom kalendaru Tzolkinu, galaktičkom modulu koji se sastoji od 260 dana i lunarnom kalendaru i solarnom kalendaru Haabu. Lunarno - solarni kalenadr broji solarnu godinu od 365 dana. Svrha ovih kalendara  je da sinkronizira solarnu godinu od 365 dana, lunarne cikluse od po 28 dana, sa galaktičkim kruženjem od 260 dana. 

 

Takav kalendar, usklađen sa prirodnim ritmovima Sunca, Lune / Mjeseca i Galaksije stavlja nas u ravnotežu sa prirodnim  ciklusima za razliku od  umjetne tvorevine gregorijanskog kalendara koji ima neravnomjernih 12 mjeseci s po 30, 31, 29 i 28 dana. Fotografija prikazuje usporedbu nepravilnog gregorijanskog kalendara sa pravilnim kalendarom 13 luna 28 dana.

Usporedba kalendara

Sve u prirodi odvija se u ciklusima, sve je u kretanju, sve je u stalnoj promjeni. Priroda prati cikluse godišnjih doba, cikluse planete Zemlje, mijenja se, raste i razvija. Kada promatramo Nebo, vidimo da se i Zvijezde kreću kroz galaksiju, galaksije se kreću kroz Univerzum, planete u solarnom sistemu se također kreću, pratimo kretanje Zemlje i Lune / Mjeseca, putovanje našeg Sunca, itd…  Ljudska bića su bića prirode, no iako su se ljudi udaljili od života u skladu sa prirodom, kao dio kreacije i dalje smo podložni istim zakonima prirode i vremena.  Kada počnemo pratiti 13 luna 28 dana vraćamo se prirodnoj frekvenciji vremena, 13: 20. Kada ponovo počnemo pratiti cikluse usklađujemo se sami sa sobom, sa prirodom, sa majkom Zemljom i Univerzumom.

Gregorijanski kalendar prati 12 mjeseci dok se Luna / Mjesec 13 puta okrene oko Zemlje u ciklusima od 28 dana.Osnovna razlika između kretanja života i kretanja mehaničkih, umjetnih tvorevina je razlika između spirale i kruga, materija je zarobljena u zatvorenom krugu, dok se život razvija, napreduje spiralnim putem, ne vrti se ukrug i nikada se ne vraća u istu točku. Gregorijanski kalendar je umjetno stvoren – nastao dogovorom, prati linearno kretanje.  U prirodi se ništa ne događa linearno, već se sve odvija u ciklusima, putuje u obliku spirale. 

 

 U sinkronaru mjeseci se zovu lune, svih 13 luna traju po 28 dana i imaju 4 tjedna od po 7 dana svaki. Luna / Mjesec se okrene oko Zemlje za 28 dana, u godini dana 13 puta. U jednoj godini imamo 13 luna (mjeseci) od po 28 dana, ukupno 52 tjedna. Ovo je novi način praćenja okretanja Zemlje oko Sunca koje traje ukupno 364 dana + 1 slobodan dan, koji se zove Dan izvan Vremena ili Zeleni dan. 

 

Sinkronar 13 luna - 28 dana ima oblik jednog Začaranog vala od 13 tonova, koji je jedna osnovna forma Vremena kao četvrte dimenzije.

 Sinkronar 13 luna prati vrijeme orbite Zemlje oko Sunca. Godišnja orbita se mjeri od 26.srpnja sve do slijedećeg 25. srpnja i zove se solarno-galaktička godina. Luna / Mjesec u solarnoj godini obiđe Zemlju 13 puta a prosječno kretanje Lune / Mjeseca oko Zemlje je 28 dana. U Sinkronaru mjeseci se zovu lune, svi traju po 28 dana i imaju 4 savršena tjedna od po 7 dana svaki. Jedna solarna godina ima 52 tjedna od po 7 dana plus jedan dan – Dan izvan vremena.

Dan izvan vremena ne pripada niti jednoj luni i niti jednom tjednu. Dan izvan Vremena je poput portala - daje mogućnost za potpuno oslobađanje od vremena. Taj dan nije u kalendaru - on je izvan Vremena - dan kada se ispraća stara godina i dočekuje nova godina, kada se slavi "Vrijeme je Umjetnost", Ljubav, Harmonija, Jedinstvo, Prijateljstvo. Dan posvećen miru kroz kulturu, umjetnosti, suradnju. Dan kada se posvećujemo meditaciji, odpuštanju i planetarnom oprostu, usmjeravanje na manifestiranje novog za dobrobit cijele kreacije, svega što posjeduje Život i osobni razvoj.

Dan izvan vremena - Zeleni dan se slavi 25. srpnja po Gregorijanskom kalendaru.  
Prvi dan Nove godine je 26. srpanj, dan kada se u zoru na istočnom nebu u konjunkciji zajedno uzdiže Sunce i zvijezda Sirius.

26. srpanj je datum koje su slavile stare kulture  - dan kada je Sirius na najvišem položaju na nebu  ( gregorijanski kalendara početak godine računa od  01. 01.)  Taj dan predstavlja osnovnu razliku između mehaničkog vremena u kojem trenutno živimo i prirodnog vremena koje je u nama.

Trinaest luna je biološki godišnji ritam ljudske vrste u jednoj orbiti oko Sunca. Kako lunarni ciklus predstavlja ženski, a solarni ciklus muški princip, te dvije energije se ujedinjuju i usklađivanjem sa Tzolkinom, galaktičkim ciklusom od 260 dana povezuju sa cjelokupnim svemirom.

Galaktičko kruženje, prikazano u svetom kalendaru Tzolkinu je jedan VREMENSKI VIR, fraktal beskonačnog kretanja stvaralačke energije koji se sinkronizira sa solarnom godinom svakih 52 godine tako da broj 52 predstavlja centralni fraktal preklapanja solarnog i galaktičkog sinkronara. Preklapanje i usklađivanje ta dva kalendara - solarnog kalendara Haaba  i kalendara Tzolkina,  možemo promatrati kao usklađivanje unutarnjeg i vanjskog vremena. 

Ovaj ciklus od 52 godine nas također povezuje i sa ciklusima Sirijusa - Sirijusu B treba 52 godine da obiđe Sirijus A. 





Fotografija prikazuje kalendar Haab i kalendar Tzolkin. Ttakođer se kalendar  Haab naziva i građanski kalendar.

Sinkronar / kalendar Začaranog sna 13 luna 28 dana  je puno više od kalendara koji prati  linearno vrijeme (npr. danas je ponedjeljak, sutra je utorak - prošlost, sadašnjost, budućnost) Sinkronar 13 luna 28 dana prati brojne prirodne cikluse različitih trajanja,  koji odražavaju harmoniju između ljudskih bića, planete Zemlje, Solarnog sistema i Galaksije. 

Ovi prirodni ciklusi formiraju bazu koja je regulirala život drevnih naroda i održavala ih u harmoniji sa biosferom planete Zemlje i Kozmosa , prije no što uspostavljena umjetna tvorevina kalendara kojim se danas služimo.

 Za Maye, Vrijeme predstavlja sponu između materijalnog (treća dimenzija) i duhovnog svijeta (peta dimenzija) i zato nam život u prirodnom vremenu frekvencije 13:20, omogućuje širenje svijesti, duhovni rast i otvara vrata za put u više dimenzije. Kroz prirodnu frekvenciju vremena 13:20 se povezujemo i sa višim dimenzijama vremena. 13:20 je frekvencija kojom živi cijeli Univerzum. 13:20 je također i univerzalna frekvencija telepatije.

Praćenje Kalendara / sinhronara 13 luna 28 dana  predstavlja praktičnu primjenu Zakona vremena i omogućuje nam živjeti pravu prirodu vremena, u frekvenciji 13:20, prirodnoj frekvenciji čitavog Univerzuma. Povezujući se sa prirodnom frekvencijom vremena,  vrijeme percipiramo kao unutarnje stanje svijesti i frekvenciju evolucije. Vrijeme je spona između 3 dimenzije i 5 dimenzije, vrijeme je povezano sa našim umom.

Kroz ovakav način praćenja Vremena širimo svoju svijest, spoznajemo sebe i svijet oko sebe kroz višedimenzionalost, upoznajemo pravu prirodu svojeg bića. Imamo mogućnost kroz prepoznavanje energije dana izaći izvan linearnog vremena, sinkronizirati se sa planetom, Suncem, sunčevim sistemom, galaksijom ... Osvijestiti svoje Svjetlosno tijelo - Holon. Imamo mogućnost kao svjesna bića povezagti se sa  svojim unutarnjim vremenom i uskladiti se sa frekvencijama koje su dio Galaksije i Univerzuma. 

Kalendar 13 luna 28 dana nas vodi jedinstvu planetarnog i galaktičkog vremena, sinkronizira mnoge cikluse, a najvažniji su lunarno - solarni ciklus od 13 x 28 dana = 364 dana + 1 dan (Dan izvan Vremena) i galaktički ciklus od 260 dana. Kako lunarni ciklus predstavlja ženski princip, solarni ciklus - muški princip - ovaj sustav vodi k nadilaženju dualnosti i ujedinjenju svega - prema Jednosti. Kroz kalendar / sinkronar 28 dana 13 luna ( mjeseci ) pratimo prirodnu frekvenciju vremena 13:20. 

Svakodnevnim praćenjem 13 luna 28 dana integriramo naše fizičko tijelo (3 dimenzija), Svjetlosno tijelo – Holon ( 4 dimenzija) i Svjetlosno tijelo Duge, kristalno tijelo ( 5 dimenzija). 
 

Zaključak. Reforma kalendara kakvu poznajemo neće se skoro promijeniti, možda nikada. Reforma je institucionalni fenomen koji uvijek teče odozgo prema dolje. Šef institucije, bilo da se radi o Cezaru, Papi ili Parlamentu, utvrđuje da današnji kalendar ima problem, ali ništa ozbiljno da bi se i pristupilo mijenju gregorijansog kalendara. Nema dovoljno ozbiljnih problema koji bi opravdali reformu. U sadašnjoj fazi tehnološkog napretka, dobrobiti bilo koje značajne reforme nikada neće nadmašiti troškove. Problem Y2K, koji je zahtijevao samo malu ispravku softvera, dao nam je uvid u tehnološke troškove reforme bilo kojeg kalendara u modernom dobu. Suvremeni politički trošak reforme teško se može procijeniti. Za političke vođe u demokratskim društvima status quo daleko je razboritiji od reforme kalendara.

Reforma kalendara kakvu poznajemo možda je mrtva. Ali nema razloga misliti da se promjena kalendara ne može dogoditi. Međutim, potrebno je vrijeme, barem nekoliko generacija. Najbolja strategija za ovu promjenu je trojanski konj koji bi postepeno mijenjao sistem ili potpuni reset civilizacije koji nitko ne želi i ne pomišlja na njega.  Zagovornik sam ovog prvog. Može se uvesti novi sustav za bilježenje datuma, sustav koji je dovoljno sličan gregorijanskom kalendaru da ga postepeno zamijeniti, tako da dva sustava datiranja jedno vrijeme funkcionirati zajedno, ali to je daleka budućnost i briga nekih novih generacija. Kao što sam napisao na početku, uvođenjem gregorijanskog kalendara, čovječanstvo je izgubilo svoju zadnju nit povezanosti sa Svemirom i prirodnim ritmom. Čovječanstvo je od tog reza potpuno skrenulo poglede s mjeseca, zvijezda i pogleda u sebe te ih fokusiralo na materiju, novac, zaboravljajući pritom svoju istinsku misiju u najboljem smislu te riječi. 

Eto, izdržali ste do kraja, možda ste se i "navukli", nastavite "virtualno" kopati i dalje sami po prostranstvima interneta, uzmite pauzu šetnjom po našoj predivnoj Zemlji, ili kao ja, zasadite novu voćku u svom permakulturnom vrtu.  Love you all. 

Parallel universes, unknown forms of matter, extra dimensions, Mandela effect

On Tuesday, the European nuclear research center  CERN said that scientists using the upgraded Large Hadron Collider (LHC),  had found three particles that had never been seen before. The misinformation effect refers to the impairment in memory for the past that arises after exposure to misleading information. When someone mentions "different dimensions," we tend to think of things like parallel universes – alternate realities that exist parallel to our own, but where things work or happened differently. However, the reality of dimensions and how they play a role in the ordering of our Universe is really quite different from this popular characterization.

Many of us, mostly total strangers, remember the exact same events with the exact same details. However, our memories are different from what’s in history books, newspaper archives, and so on. Memories can cross over from parallel universes claim conspiracy theorists This isn’t a conspiracy, and we’re not talking about ‘false memories. Many of us speculate that parallel realities exist, and we’ve been “sliding” between them without realizing it.

The world’s biggest and most powerful particle collider started up again after a three-year break for improvements. Researchers can look at twenty times more collisions now that the LHC has been updated.

Researchers at CERN found a “pentaquark” and the first pair of “tetraquarks” with the help of the improved collider.

What does it mean that particles have been found?

Chris Parkes, a spokesman for the LHCb experiment, which was designed to find out what happened after the Big Bang, says that this discovery will help theorists make a unified model of exotic hadrons, the nature of which is mostly unknown.

“We are in a time of discovery that is similar to the 1950s, when a “particle zoo” of hadrons started to be found, which led to the quark model of normal hadrons in the 1960s. “We’re making ‘particle zoo 2.0,'” said Niels Tuning, who is in charge of physics at the LHCb.

A quark is an electron that can’t be broken up into smaller pieces. Hadrons, like the protons and neutrons that make up atomic nuclei, which are an important part of the universe, are made when two or three quarks come together. Before the LHC got better, it was hard to find these particles because they often broke apart quickly.

The upgraded Large Hadron Collider will run for about four years at 13.6 trillion electronvolts. Tuning said, “The more analyses we do, the more kinds of strange hadrons we find.” #HiLumiLHC

Researchers want to learn more about “dark matter,” which has never been seen or touched. CERN also wants to find out more about how the subatomic particles that make matter and antimatter are made and how they break down. 

But, of course, some out there (me) have concerns that the collider will open a gateway to a parallel dimension from which there is no return. CERN has always been the subject of various conspiracy theories, from the creation of black holes to human sacrifices on the grounds. 

Who has felt like a big shift is coming for a while now? Keep your positive vibes and energy up.

Theories suggest extra dimensions predict that in the same way as atoms have a low-energy ground state and excited high-energy states, there would be heavier versions of standard particles in other dimensions. These heavier versions of particles – called Kaluza-Klein states – would have exactly the same properties as standard particles (and so be visible to our detectors) but with a greater mass. 

If CMS or ATLAS were to find a Z- or W-like particle (the Z and W bosons being carriers of the electroweak force) with a mass 100 times larger, for instance, this might suggest the presence of extra dimensions. Such heavy particles can only be revealed at the high energies reached by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC).

Another possibility is that the LHC could produce (extremely) temporary and (incredibly) miniature black holes. The appearance of these microscopic black holes could tell us about the existence of extra dimensions. However, they are not anything that will engulf the planet and would collapse in on themselves in about 10-27 seconds. 

Parallel universes, unknown forms of matter, extra dimensions... These are not the stuff of cheap science fiction but very concrete physics theories that scientists are trying to confirm with the LHC and other experiments. The ramifications of what happened today will unfold in the coming months. I’ve looked into this, look for 10x more Mandela effects.. because back in 2012 they did a record voltage level that caused these Mandela effects, whatever portal they’re opening, they shouldn’t.

CHANGE IS HAPPENING IN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

 

CCRES proudly presents to you 

ELECTRIC VEHICLE EVOLUTION LLC

Convert a gas-powered car to a battery electric power.

The possibilities are somewhat endless if you buy a build-your-own electric car kit. Think about it. With an electric car conversion kit, you can transform any vehicle into a sustainable steed. For example, you could take a  Classic Porsche apply electric parts to it.

You’re now the proud owner of an EV.

EV-Evolution Europe is a company focused on delivering a sustainable transition of all existing transportation from fossil fuels to electric power. The environment’s most friendly way to do it is to keep the existing vehicles and to have them converted to electric. 

EV-Evolution Europe webshop: https://ev-evolution.eu/shop/

They offer a complete kit for converting a car into an electric vehicle with all the necessary parts.

Their EV conversion kit contains instructions and videos to help you convert your car into an EV. They also provide EV conversion services for you.

15-200 kW Electric Motor for EV Conversion Kit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwr5c2zQLg0&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ

All of their EV conversion kits are designed in such a way that any auto mechanic can do this integration for you. They design and offer mounts for an easy engine replacement.

EV Public Charger 3-22kW Assembly and Activation (part 1)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wzo_hvbL1Ys&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ

EV-Evolution Europe is an industry-leading Electric Vehicle (EV) company offering complete EV conversion kits, EV components, EV education, training courses, and technical build support. 

EV-Evolution Europe webshop: https://ev-evolution.eu/shop/

EV-Evolution Europe can convert your fleet to electric power, build your custom EV, or get any shop the parts and training they need in order to complete EV conversions themselves. EV-Evolution Europe is working to ensure the transition to Electric Vehicles does not mean we have to lose the cars we love and the auto shops we trust.

EV Public Charger 3-22kW Assembly and Activation (part 2)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NHlamXPXaQ&feature=share&si=ELPmzJkDCLju2KnD5oyZMQ

EV-Evolution Europe is looking for components suppliers for electric vehicles like electric motors, controllers, wiring harnesses, batteries, gearboxes, electronics, measurement tools, inverters, chargers, car dashboard electronics, power steering systems, vacuum brake boosters, DC-DC converters, and others.

ELECTRIC VEHICLE EVOLUTION LLC

Drage Gervaisa 44

10090 Zagreb

Croatia – EU

For more information, go to https://ev-evolution.eu/ or call  +385 92 421 9257

Europe’s shift to a low-carbon future

Around three-quarters of the EU’s total population live in cities and suburban areas, and this proportion is projected to increase. Cities are also responsible for a large proportion of carbon emissions. The dynamism and density of cities mean that they have great potential to become models for low-carbon lifestyles. Urban prosumers can make a critical contribution to decarbonizing their communities.

Municipalities can support prosumers by providing publicly owned spaces or encouraging other private buildings or landowners to offer spaces that can be used for citizen-led energy generation. These can include rooftops of schools, hospitals, apartments, or unused lands which can be used to install solar panels or other renewable energy technologies. Local authorities can also offer targeted financial incentives for companies to promote citizen participation and encourage public involvement in energy planning. Municipalities can also act as information hubs and contribute to building the right skills to help those interested in installing renewables.

Each city is unique but they have some common attributes that establish a setting for prosumption that is distinct from more rural areas, for example:

Establishing prosumption in cities is more challenging than in rural areas because of the limited space available for energy generation and the more complex arrangements for the ownership of surfaces (such as rooftops in apartment blocks).

Cities are more densely populated than rural areas, making rooftop solar technology the renewable technology of choice. High population densities also make heat grids more profitable, offering the potential to develop prosumer initiatives related to heat grids in cities.

More people live in apartment blocks, which opens opportunities for collective action but makes it harder to coordinate investment.

Short travel distances make cities ideal for using electric vehicles, both private and public. Urban prosumer concepts are more likely to involve coupling with mobility.

Cities can offer opportunities for developing integrated energy districts, for example, when areas within a city are redeveloped or new areas are added.

Generating electricity outside the city (off-site generation) opens up possibilities for prosumers to overcome the lack of space.

Prosumers of renewable energy can make a critical contribution to decarbonizing their communities. Prosumers are defined as entities — individuals, households, small or medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), or institutions — that actively participate in the energy system. Active participation can be through self-generating renewable heat or power, and also through providing energy system services such as demand flexibility and energy storage services, enabling larger amounts of intermittent wind and solar energy to be integrated into the system. Prosumers can act as individuals (e.g. a single household) or as part of a collective (e.g. a block of apartments or an energy community). A comprehensive overview of prosumers and the different models of prosumption is available in the recent EEA report Energy prosumers in Europe: citizen participation in the energy transition (EEA, 2022b).

Each city is unique, with its own characteristics and solutions. However, cities have some common attributes that establish a setting for prosumption that is distinct from the setting in more rural areas. For example:

Cities are more densely populated than rural areas, making rooftop solar technology the renewable technology of choice rather than technologies that require open space, such as wind turbines. The higher population density of cities also makes heat grids more profitable than in rural areas, thus offering the potential to develop prosumer initiatives related to heat grids in cities.

More people live in apartment blocks in cities. This makes it harder to coordinate investment since it requires agreement among several people with different interests and financial capabilities.

Short travel distances make cities ideal for using electric vehicles, both private and public. Urban prosumer concepts are thus more likely to involve coupling between the energy and mobility sectors, for example in the form of onsite renewable energy plants delivering power for charging electric vehicles.

Cities can offer opportunities for developing integrated energy districts, for example when areas within a city are redeveloped or new areas are added. Integrated energy districts often use a variety of energy technologies and are used by a variety of interconnected sectors.

Apartment blocks have a smaller rooftop area per inhabitant than houses. Depending on the architecture and height of the buildings, shadowing effects from neighboring buildings may also limit the area of a rooftop that is suitable for solar photovoltaic (PV) energy generation. At the same time, a high population density will mean a high energy demand close to the point of energy generation, minimizing transmission losses. This combination of relatively low generation potential and high energy demand highlights the importance of maximizing the use of suitable rooftops for energy generation in cities.

However, organizing investment for a joint PV plant or implementing collective self-consumption in an apartment block is significantly more complicated than doing so in a single-family home. Different ownership structures and country-specific regulations mean that problems and challenges vary. In all cases, however, the relevant parties must discuss and agree on a specific approach to organizing investment in and the operation of the rooftop system. The collaborative nature of this model can have positive effects on the community, although it can also pose a barrier to prosumer projects if agreements cannot be reached. An alternative to collaborative investment is to lease the rooftop to a third-party operator and for apartment block owners to receive some of the energy generated in lieu of lease payments.

Outside the scope of municipalities, national housing policies have an important impact on the deployment of rooftop PV energy systems in apartment blocks. Decision-making and access to finance may be easier when the building is owned by a single entity rather than multiple private owners. Therefore, countries with high shares of social housing, housing associations, or large landlords might make more progress in this regard than countries with lower shares.

The possibility of generating electricity in one location and consuming it elsewhere, known as an offsite generation, enables many citizens to become prosumers irrespective of the space they have available. Virtual net metering is one option used in offsite prosumption models. With virtual net metering, prosumers can generate electricity outside the city (e.g. at a second home or as part of an energy community) and inject this electricity into the grid. The prosumers then get a discount on their household energy bills based on the energy generated. National regulation should support offsite prosumption concepts. However, as offsite prosumption requires the use of the national electricity grid, grid fees and other related costs must be taken into account and covered by the offsite generation project.

In an integrated energy district (often a newly built or converted area), inhabitants can actively participate in a local energy system that integrates electricity, heating, and mobility. As a simplified example, an integrated energy district can generate its own renewable energy, providing electricity to the community, for instance by providing charging points for a local electric car-sharing scheme. At the same time, it can power a small district heating network supplemented with heat pumps. This integration between different sectors is sometimes referred to as ‘sector coupling’.

The concrete implementation and ownership arrangements necessarily differ between districts, depending on local conditions and the participants involved[1]. For example, an energy cooperative could invest in and operate the energy system. Alternatively, a commercial entity could manage the energy aspect of the district and offer inhabitants the option to get involved when they move into the area.

In integrated energy districts, citizens can participate as advisers, idea providers, and discussion partners during the development process if the community’s planning and development approach allows this. Furthermore, citizens can act as investors, contributing their own money, time, labor, skills, and expertise. This could happen in different ‘legal’ or regulatory settings such as working groups, initiatives, associations, cooperatives, or as part of private non-profit or for-profit organizations.

Cities can play a very important role in enabling prosumption, even if the main relevant laws and regulatory frameworks are set at a national level.

Cities often own public buildings (e.g. schools, sports facilities, administrative buildings) and dominate shares of public companies (e.g. housing associations or local utility providers), as well as owning land areas within the city. Thus, municipalities can use their own buildings for prosumption or allocate unused lands, such as brownfield land or railway margins, to local energy communities for energy generation. They can encourage publicly owned companies to initiate and invest in collective prosumer models (Becker et al., 2017). In the case of private companies, municipal governments can use their convening power to bring key local stakeholders together and — possibly — initiate memoranda of understanding with the same aim.

Municipal authorities can set up their own support schemes when such approaches are deemed desirable and compatible with national law. This could be in the form of direct financial support for projects or indirect support through tax relief. They could also procure locally produced electricity and increase the visibility of citizen-led projects and initiatives (Haf and Robison, 2020).

In addition, municipalities can set requirements or terms and conditions for awarding energy infrastructure concessions to companies or initiatives that enable citizens to participate in decision-making processes.

Municipalities are usually responsible for many energy-related decisions. Integrated energy planning and management are often central tasks of municipalities, in collaboration with regional and national authorities. Through the development of dedicated masterplans and strategies, municipalities can lay down their ambitions for the energy transformation, make it clear who is accountable for progress and clarify what the role of citizens should be in the decarbonization process. Critically, the development of these local masterplans should involve citizens, in a participatory process, so that inhabitants, as important stakeholders, are consulted and can express their opinions (Judson et al., 2020).

For citizens to take an active role in local planning, municipal authorities need to be approachable, with an open-door policy, and adopt participative governance strategies (Haf and Robison, 2020). In addition, a framework for cooperation among local stakeholders, such as municipalities, energy communities, energy utility providers and citizens, should be put in place.

Developing and implementing prosumer concepts often requires high levels of expertise and specialist knowledge in many different areas. Information is usually dispersed across several stakeholders. Actor constellations and interactions are often unique, which might lead to considerable transaction costs for aspiring prosumers. This is particularly true in cities, where becoming a prosumer tends to be more complicated than in rural areas.

As highlighted in the REPowerEU plan and its EU solar strategy, a key action for incentivizing prosumption is to set up one-stop shops that give citizens impartial advice and practical help on roof renovations, solar generation, and energy storage in an integrated manner, covering everything from the technical requirements to the administrative steps and financial support available. Local and regional authorities, and their implementing institutions, such as energy or business support agencies, are well suited to this task, functioning as aggregators of information and facilitators and helping to bring stakeholders together (Bale et al., 2012).

Finally, cities can contribute to addressing the skills shortage, which is becoming an increasingly important barrier to the deployment of prosumer and energy efficiency projects. Adapting vocational training to current needs usually depends on the actions of national or regional authorities, and is constrained by educational regulatory frameworks. Nevertheless, cities can help to ensure that existing skills are put to good use by providing incentives for suitably qualified people to set up businesses. Incentives could include subsidizing workshop space and providing local tax breaks. Municipal authorities can also join the Pact for Skills large-scale skills partnership, as encouraged by the REPowerEU plan.

Investigation - Ukraine attacks Russia!

 

This article was written as part of the combat disinformation.

"Ukraine attacks Russia!” was the surreal headline on a report in the 22 February edition of Informer, Serbia’s biggest-selling tabloid. That headline was not a one-off, it was an expression of the Putinophilia that has been strong in Serbia for years. This story was also mentioned in the BBC’s report on the events the day before as an example of Russian disinformation. “There is no evidence to suggest that any of these things happened, but officials are forced to deny any claim, no matter how absurd or unlikely,” BBC correspondent Paul Adams wrote on 21 February. Towards the end of the article, Informer also published brief information that the Ukrainian government denied the attacks on Russia and called the reports fabricated.

The first version of the front page of Večernje novosti, another pro-government newspaper, from 22 February, also published information about the murder of five Ukrainian soldiers. That information was removed from the printed version that was available in Belgrade that day, probably after it was marked as fake news. The front page of the Informer a day later, on 23 February, reported that “Putin checkmated Ukraine”, and that, the day after Russia recognized the independence of Donetsk and Lugansk, the Ukrainians are backing down and that “there would be no war”. As most of the world condemned Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, much of the media in Serbia turned to the glorification of Russia’s actions. Tabloids, web portals, dailies, weeklies, and national television channels celebrated the destruction of Ukrainian cities and gave wholehearted support to Russian armed forces. The killing of civilians, the leveling of cities, and the destruction of cultural monuments appeared to fill some of Serbia’s editors with enthusiasm and exuberance.

Pro-Russia rallies took place in Belgrade, at which the crowd cheered Putin and the letter Z was scrawled on the asphalt. The rest of the world shuddered as it watched real-time coverage of corpses on the streets of Bucha, civilians sheltering from Russian shells in underground stations, and millions of refugees fleeing their country, but instead of compassion for innocent victims, understanding for the criminals seemed the response of Putin’s Serbian fans.

If President Aleksandar Vučić’s allies in the Serb media appear sanguine about death and destruction in Ukraine, he claims that the country is politically neutral. Serbia has grudgingly voted in favor of the UN general assembly’s resolutions condemning Russia’s use of force in the illegal annexation of Ukrainian territory. But the Vučić government has repeatedly refused to back western sanctions against Russia. European officials, US senators, and various envoys have flocked to Vučić, telling him that it was time to choose: would Serbia be part of Europe or an ally of Russia? Despite all the pressure, Vučić keeps Serbia in limbo.

But there can be no neutrality when it comes to Russia’s campaign against Ukraine. To remain neutral while an executioner butchers a victim means morally siding with the executioner.

Serbia’s attitude towards the war in Ukraine requires additional context. Whereas in other countries, the Russian state-owned news agency, Sputnik, and the Russian TV channel RT diffuse the Kremlin’s propaganda, in Serbia most of the domestic media act as if they themselves are part of the Russian machinery under the command of the Kremlin’s communications supervisors. The problem is not limited to the media. Serbia has never renounced the Greater Serbia nationalist ideology that led to the wars of the former Yugoslavia. The one exception was the short premiership of Zoran Đinđić, but that was cut short by his assassination in 2003.

Today’s Serb political leaders were participants in the wars of the 1990s. Vučić was a high-ranking official of the Serbian Radical party of convicted war criminal Vojislav Šešelj. His coalition partner Ivica Dačić, leader of the Socialist party of Serbia, was Slobodan Milošević’s spokesman. One of Vučić’s closest associates, the minister of the interior, Aleksandar Vulin, began his career as a functionary of the Yugoslav Left, the party founded by Milošević’s late wife, Mirjana Marković. Today’s minister for European integration, Jadranka Joksimović, worked on the Serbian Radical party’s magazine, Velika Srbija, whose title (Greater Serbia) speaks for itself.

Serbian political leaders still don’t publicly acknowledge Srebrenica as genocide. If at all, they refer to the “terrible crimes” committed. But there has been no dealing with the past at the state level. On the contrary, political, media, cultural, church, and social elites continue to deny Serbian responsibility for war crimes. Serbia’s recent historical revisionism suggests that it was Serbs who were the victims, never the criminals. Internationally convicted Serb war criminals return home after serving their sentences and are given heroes’ welcomes, sinecures, and media space to expound their version of the truth, which The Hague tribunal was of course, unable to understand.

Murals sport the image of Ratko Mladić often with the slogan “Serbian hero” in cities all over Serbia. Anyone who speaks about Serbian crimes is smeared as a traitor by a media lynch mob. At the Serbian war crimes prosecutor’s office, 2,500 cases have been languishing at the pre-trial investigation stage for years. According to estimates by the Humanitarian Law Center in Belgrade, at least 6,000 unconvicted war criminals freely walk the streets of Serbian cities.

For far-right Serb nationalists, the current state of peace in the Balkans is temporary, just like the borders. They still dream of a great Serbian state that will encompass Kosovo, Montenegro, Republika Srpska, and parts of Croatia. The realization of that dream is not possible as things stand, but the nationalists are patient. After defeat in the Yugoslav wars, they retreated to lick their wounds, fuel hatred towards their neighbors, and keep the population in a state of combat readiness via the media. That they must bide their time until international circumstances change has been one of the main narratives of Russian propaganda for the Serbian market filtered through parts of the Serb media for more than two decades.

Serb ultra-nationalists have waited for Russia to enter into a decisive conflict with the western antichrist, to defeat godless Europe, and the USand to establish a different world order. They have placed their faith in Putin as a messiah and imagine him as an upgraded version of Slobodan Milošević: the ruler of a powerful empire with a nuclear arsenal at his disposal.

When Russia invaded Ukraine, Putin’s followers here thought their hour had come; this was the beginning of the great upheaval in which the old order would be razed and from its ruins, a world would arise where sovereignty, borders, and international treaties were of no import. Instead of international law and other western trifles, the law of the jungle would prevail, as authoritarian tradition dictates. States such as Serbia, favored by the world’s ruler enthroned in the Kremlin would gain the right to finish what they started three decades ago to finally create the enlarged state for which they have been longing for centuries, to fit their own imagined grandeur.

Lauding Russia’s criminal aggression against a sovereign country may seem strange to the uninformed. But for those of us who live in the heart of darkness, a country whose heroes are Slobodan Milošević, Radovan Karadžić, and Ratko Mladić, we expect nothing better. Those who still believe conspiracy theories about the 1994 massacre in Sarajevo’s Markale that it was staged and the dismembered corpses were actually dummies, will easily believe similar propaganda about the massacres of civilians in Bucha. If media hyenas can deride the victims of the Srebrenica genocide on primetime TV, why would they grieve for the victims of Putin’s crimes? As the great Serbian writer and thinker, Radomir Konstantinović said in 1991: “We live in a world (if this is living) in which the monstrous is coming to be natural, and the natural monstrous.” His diagnosis of Serbia has, unfortunately, lost none of its accuracy.

This article is part of a series, published in collaboration with Voxeurop, featuring perspectives on the invasion of Ukraine from the former Soviet bloc and bordering countries. Be informed. Participate. Talk. Provide support. We believe that news is a public good; the support of our readers will ensure that our blog remains independent. Reporting on Europe and the world from a European point of view, encouraging the exchange of ideas across borders and languages: this is the enormous journalistic task we have undertaken and the civic adventure we invite you to undertake. Let's create a benchmark for European media of civil society and citizens.

Links to published articles:

Voice of America, 2 March 2022, https://www.glasamerike.net/a/srbija-lazne-vesti-ukrajina-rusija-rat-pandemija/6466774.html

European Western Balkan https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2022/03/23/rooting-for-russia-then-blaming-the-west-evolution-of-serbian-tabloids-reporting-on-the-war-in-ukraine/

Voice of America, 2. March 2022, https://www.glasamerike.net/a/srbija-lazne-vesti-ukrajina-rusija-rat-pandemija/6466774.html

Istinomer, 11. Mart 2022, https://www.istinomer.rs/facebook-provere/razvijanje-biohemijskog-oruzja-za-unistenje-rusa-reciklirana-teorija-zavere/

Istinomer, https://www.istinomer.rs/facebook-provere/razvijanje-biohemijskog-oruzja-za-unistenje-rusa-reciklirana-teorija-zavere/

Istraga - Ukrajina napala Rusiju!

Ovaj članak je napisan u sklopu borbe protiv dezinformacija.

Ova je priča spomenuta i u BBC-jevom izvješću o događajima dan ranije kao primjer ruske dezinformacije. "Nema dokaza koji upućuju na to da se bilo koja od ovih stvari dogodila, ali dužnosnici su prisiljeni poreći bilo kakvu tvrdnju, bez obzira koliko apsurdna ili malo vjerojatna", napisao je 21. veljače dopisnik BBC-ja Paul Adams. Pred kraj teksta Informer je objavio i kratku informaciju da je ukrajinska vlada demantirala napade na Rusiju i nazvala izvješća izmišljenima.

Prva verzija naslovnice Večernjih novosti, još jednog provladinog lista, od 22. veljače također je objavila informaciju o ubojstvu petorice ukrajinskih vojnika. Ta je informacija uklonjena iz tiskane verzije koja je tog dana bila dostupna u Beogradu, vjerojatno nakon što je označena kao lažna vijest. Naslovnica Informera dan kasnije, 23. veljače, objavila je da je “Putin šah-matirao Ukrajinu”, a dan nakon što je Rusija priznala neovisnost Donjecka i Luganska, Ukrajinci se povlače i da “rata ne bi bilo”.

Odnos Srbije prema ratu u Ukrajini zahtijeva dodatni kontekst. Dok u drugim zemljama ruska državna novinska agencija Sputnik i ruski TV kanal RT šire propagandu Kremlja, u Srbiji se većina domaćih medija ponaša kao da su i sami dio ruske mašinerije pod zapovjedništvom Kremlja. Problem naravno nije ograničen samo na medije. Srbija se nikada nije odrekla velikosrpske nacionalističke ideologije koja je dovela do ratova u bivšoj Jugoslaviji. Jedina iznimka bila je kratka premijerska vladavina Zorana Đinđića, ali to je prekinuto njegovim ubojstvom 2003. godine.

Današnje srpske političke vođe bile su sudionice ratova devedesetih. Vučić je bio visoki dužnosnik Srpske radikalne stranke osuđenog ratnog zločinca Vojislava Šešelja. Njegov koalicijski partner Ivica Dačić, čelnik Socijalističke partije Srbije, bio je glasnogovornik Slobodana Miloševića. Jedan od najbližih Vučićevih suradnika, ministar unutarnjih poslova Aleksandar Vulin, karijeru je započeo kao dužnosnik Jugoslavenske ljevice, stranke koju je osnovala Miloševićeva pokojna supruga Mirjana Marković. Današnja ministrica za europske integracije Jadranka Joksimović radila je u časopisu Srpske radikalne stranke Velika Srbija, čiji naziv (Velika Srbija) govori sam za sebe. Srpski politički lideri još uvijek javno ne priznaju Srebrenicu kao genocid. Suočavanja s prošlošću na državnoj razini nije bilo. Naprotiv, političke, medijske, kulturne, crkvene i društvene elite i dalje negiraju odgovornost Srbije za ratne zločine. Nedavni povijesni revizionizam u Srbiji sugerira da su Srbi bili žrtve, a ne zločinci. Međunarodno osuđeni srpski ratni zločinci vraćaju se kući nakon odslužene kazne, pa bivaju dočekani kao heroji i dobivaju medijski prostor da iznesu svoju verziju istine za koju vjeruju da Haaški sud, naravno, nije mogao razumjeti.

Za ekstremno desne srpske nacionaliste mir na Balkanu samo je privremen, baš kao što su i granice. I dalje sanjaju veliku srpsku državu koja će obuhvaćati Kosovo, Crnu Goru, Republiku Srpsku i dijelove Hrvatske. Ostvarenje tog sna nije sada moguće, ali nacionalisti su strpljivi. Nakon poraza u jugoslavenskim ratovima povukli su se kako bi lizali rane, raspirivali mržnju prema susjedima i putem medija držali stanovništvo u stanju borbene pripravnosti. ‘Moramo čekati dok se međunarodne okolnosti ne promijene‘, jedan je od glavnih narativa ruske propagande plasiran na srpsko tržište, a koji se filtrira kroz dijelove srpskih medija više od dva desetljeća.

Srpski ultranacionalisti čekali su da Rusija uđe u ‘odlučujući sukob sa zapadnim antikristom, da porazi bezbožnu Europu i SAD i uspostavi drugačiji svjetski poredak‘. Povjerovali su u Putina kao mesiju i zamišljaju ga kao nadograđenu verziju Slobodana Miloševića: vladara moćnog carstva s nuklearnim arsenalom na raspolaganju.

Kada je Rusija napala Ukrajinu, Putinovi sljedbenici mislili su da je došao njihov čas; to je bio početak velikog preokreta u kojem će stari poredak biti srušen i iz njegovih ruševina nastati svijet u kojem suverenitet, granice i međunarodni ugovori nisu bili važni. Umjesto međunarodnog prava i ostalih zapadnjačkih sitnica, zavladao bi zakon džungle, kako autoritarna tradicija nalaže. Države poput Srbije, kako oni vjeruju omiljene od strane vladara ustoličenog u Kremlju, stekle bi pravo da dovrše ono što su započele prije tri desetljeća

Hvaljenje ruske zločinačke agresije na suverenu zemlju neupućenima može izgledati čudno. Ali, kako kaže mi koji živimo u srcu tame, zemlje čiji su heroji Slobodan Milošević, Radovan Karadžić i Ratko Mladić, ne očekujemo ništa bolje.

Oni koji još uvijek vjeruju u teorije zavjere o masakru na sarajevskim Markalama 1994. godine da je namješten i da su raskomadani leševi zapravo lutke, lako će povjerovati sličnoj propagandi o masakru civila u Buči. Ako se medijske hijene mogu rugati žrtvama genocida u Srebrenici u udarnom TV terminu, zašto bi žalile za žrtvama Putinovih zločina? Kako je veliki srpski pisac i mislilac Radomir Konstantinović rekao 1991. godine: “Živimo u svijetu (ako je ovo život) u kojem čudovišno postaje prirodno, a prirodno čudovišno.” Njegova dijagnoza Srbije, nažalost, nije ništa izgubila na točnosti.

Ovaj je članak dio serije, objavljene u suradnji s Voxeuropom, koja prikazuje perspektive invazije na Ukrajinu iz bivšeg sovjetskog bloka i susjednih zemalja. Budite informirani. Sudjelujte. Razgovarajte. Pružite podršku. Vjerujemo da su vijesti javno dobro; podrška naših čitatelja osigurat će da naš blog ostane neovisan. Izvještavanje o Europi i svijetu s europskog stajališta, poticanje razmjene ideja preko granica i jezika: ovo je golemi novinarski zadatak koji smo preuzeli i građanska avantura na koju vas pozivamo. Stvorimo mjerilo za europske medije civilnog društva i građana.

Poveznice na objavljene članke:

Glas Amerike, 2. mart 2022., https://www.glasamerike.net/a/srbija-lazne-vesti-ukrajina-rusija-rat-pandemija/6466774.html

European Western Balkans https://europeanwesternbalkans.com/2022/03/23/rooting-for-russia-then-blaming-the-west-evolution-of-serbian-tabloids-reporting-on-the-war-in-ukraine/

Glas Amerike, 2. mart 2022., https://www.glasamerike.net/a/srbija-lazne-vesti-ukrajina-rusija-rat-pandemija/6466774.html

Istinomer, 11. mart 2022, https://www.istinomer.rs/facebook-provere/razvijanje-biohemijskog-oruzja-za-unistenje-rusa-reciklirana-teorija-zavere/

Istinomer, https://www.istinomer.rs/facebook-provere/razvijanje-biohemijskog-oruzja-za-unistenje-rusa-reciklirana-teorija-zavere/