Trump’s Renewable Ban

President Donald Trump said his administration will not approve solar and wind projects.

Renewable executives say blocking solar and wind projects will worsen a power supply shortage, harming the grid and leading to higher prices.

The industry is facing difficulty getting permits, rising costs due to tariffs, and the end of key tax credits.

Shares in wind farm developer Orsted lost ground on Monday.

The U.S. government last week ordered the company to halt construction of an almost completed project.

President Donald Trump’s attack on solar and wind projects threatens to raise energy prices for consumers and undermine a stretched electric grid that’s already straining to meet rapidly growing demand, renewable energy executives warn.

Trump has long said wind power turbines are unattractive and endanger birds, and that solar installations take up too much land. This week, he said his administration will not approve solar and wind projects, the latest salvo in a campaign the president has waged against the renewable energy industry since taking office.

“We will not approve wind or farmer destroying Solar,” Trump posted on Truth Social Wednesday. “The days of stupidity are over in the USA!!!”

The red tape at the Interior Department and rising costs from Trump’s copper and steel tariffs have created market instability that makes planning difficult, the renewable executives said.

Shares in wind farm developer Orsted tumbled soon as trading kicked off on Monday after the U.S. government ordered the company to halt construction of a nearly completed project.

By mid-morning, the company’s shares were around 17% lower, with shares hitting a record low according to LSEG data.

Late on Friday the U.S.′ Bureau of Ocean Energy Management had issued a stop-work order for the Revolution Wind Project off of Rhode Island. According to Orsted, the project is 80% complete and 45 out of 65 wind turbines have been installed.

How Trump's move to block solar and wind could hit your energy bills and the electric grid. President Donald Trump’s announcement to stop approving solar and wind projects is shaking the renewable energy sector. This short news explainer breaks down how permit delays, tariffs, ending tax credits, and the recent stop-work order on Orsted’s Revolution Wind project could worsen power shortages, strain the grid, and push energy prices higher for consumers. Hear why renewable executives warn of market instability and what this means for homeowners and policymakers. Like and share this video to spread awareness.

#RenewableEnergy #Trump #EnergyPrices #Solar #Wind #Orsted #RevolutionWind #GridReliability

Will AI Make Universal High Income (UHI) Inevitable

Universal High Income (UHI) is a concept proposed by Elon Musk as an ambitious evolution of Universal Basic Income (UBI). While UBI aims to provide a baseline income to ensure basic needs are met, UHI envisions a future where AI and automation generate such vast economic abundance that individuals receive a significantly higher level of income, enabling not just survival but a prosperous, high-quality standard of living. Below is my explanation of UHI, its origins, underlying principles, and potential implications.

Universal High Income, as envisioned by Elon Musk, is a bold extension of the Universal Basic Income concept, leveraging AI-driven economic abundance to provide not just survival but prosperity for all. It reflects an optimistic view of technology’s potential to create a post-scarcity society, where individuals are free to pursue their passions without financial constraints. However, its implementation faces significant economic, social, and political challenges, requiring innovative policies and global cooperation. While UHI remains a theoretical proposition, it sparks critical discussions about how society can harness AI’s transformative power to create a more equitable and prosperous future.

#AI #UniversalBasicIncome #ElonMusk #SamAltman #FutureOfWork #Automation #TechDebate

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping the global economy, raising profound questions about the future of work, wealth distribution, and societal stability. As AI and automation threaten to displace millions of jobs, tech visionaries like Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and others have championed the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) as a potential solution to mitigate the economic and social disruptions caused by these technological shifts. This essay explores their perspectives on AI-funded UBI, its implications, and the broader debate surrounding its feasibility and necessity.

Elon Musk: From Universal Basic Income to Universal High Income

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, has been a vocal advocate for UBI, arguing that it will become inevitable as AI and automation render traditional jobs obsolete. Musk envisions a future where AI-driven technologies, such as humanoid robots, dramatically increase economic productivity, potentially leading to an economy "10 times the size of the current global economy." He argues that this unprecedented abundance could enable not just a Universal Basic Income but a "Universal High Income" (UHI), where individuals have access to goods and services far beyond basic needs, creating a post-scarcity society. Musk’s concept of UHI represents a bold evolution of UBI, emphasizing prosperity rather than mere subsistence. He suggests that AI and robotics could act as a new form of "capita," exponentially amplifying economic output and making such a system feasible.

However, Musk acknowledges the risks of this transition, warning of potential dystopian outcomes if AI development is mismanaged. He contrasts a "Star Trek" future of exploration and prosperity with a "Terminator"-like scenario of societal collapse, emphasizing the need for proactive policies like UBI to ensure equitable wealth distribution. Musk’s advocacy is rooted in his belief that fostering innovation and entrepreneurship alongside UBI will prepare society for an AI-driven future, preventing economic disparity and social unrest.

Sam Altman: 

UBI as a Safety Net for an AI-Driven WorldSam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, is another prominent figure advocating for UBI as a response to AI-induced job displacement. Altman has actively supported research into UBI, most notably through OpenResearch’s landmark study, which provided $1,000 monthly payments to 1,000 low-income participants in Illinois and Texas over three years. The study found that recipients spent more on basic needs like food, rent, and transportation, worked slightly fewer hours, and reported increased autonomy and flexibility in their lives. These findings bolster Altman’s argument that UBI can provide a safety net, enabling individuals to pursue meaningful work or education without the constant pressure of economic survival.

Altman’s vision extends beyond traditional UBI to a concept he calls "universal basic compute," where individuals receive access to computational resources rather than cash, reflecting his belief in the transformative power of AI. He sees UBI as a necessary response to the economic inequalities exacerbated by AI, which he predicts will eliminate many traditional jobs. However, Altman’s approach is pragmatic, emphasizing the need for data-driven insights to refine UBI’s implementation. His support for UBI is also strategic, aiming to mitigate the societal fallout of AI advancements while fostering a business environment conducive to innovation.

Other Voices in the Debate

The conversation around AI-funded UBI extends beyond Musk and Altman to other tech leaders and researchers, revealing a spectrum of opinions. Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer in AI, supports UBI as a means to address job losses caused by automation, aligning with Musk and Altman’s views. However, Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, offers a more cautious perspective, describing UBI as a "kind of dystopian" solution that may not fully address the deeper systemic issues of AI-driven inequality. Amodei advocates for alternative approaches to ensure economic inclusion without centralizing wealth or power.

Critics like Jaron Lanier, a computer scientist, argue that UBI risks reinforcing dependency on tech elites, potentially creating a society where individuals feel obsolete. Lanier proposes empowering people as "proud data providers" in a new economy rather than relying on handouts, highlighting the ethical concerns of UBI as a tech-driven solution. Similarly, some researchers question the feasibility of funding UBI, raising concerns about inflation, tax burdens, and its impact on work incentives. These critiques underscore the complexity of implementing UBI at scale and the need for comprehensive policy frameworks that integrate AI governance with economic reform.

The Broader Implications of AI-Funded UBI

The advocacy for AI-funded UBI by Musk, Altman, and others reflects a broader recognition of the transformative impact of AI on society. Proponents argue that UBI could redistribute the wealth generated by AI, ensuring economic stability and allowing individuals to pursue creative, educational, or entrepreneurial endeavors. Studies like Altman’s demonstrate tangible benefits, such as increased spending on basic needs, improved healthcare access, and greater agency, particularly for low-income individuals. These findings suggest that UBI could empower people to navigate the uncertainties of an AI-driven economy.

However, the debate is far from settled. Funding UBI remains a significant challenge, with questions about whether it would lead to inflation or require substantial tax increases, potentially affecting the middle class. Critics also argue that UBI could alter the social contract, redefining the role of work and creating new societal hierarchies based on access to resources. Moreover, the involvement of tech elites in UBI advocacy raises concerns about their motives, with some suggesting it serves as a preemptive measure to manage social backlash against AI-driven disruptions.

Conclusion

Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and other tech leaders see AI-funded Universal Basic Income as a critical tool to address the economic and social challenges posed by automation and AI. Musk’s vision of a Universal High Income envisions a future of abundance, while Altman’s data-driven approach emphasizes UBI’s role as a safety net. However, dissenting voices like Amodei and Lanier highlight the need for alternative solutions and caution against over-reliance on tech-driven welfare. As AI continues to reshape the global economy, the debate over UBI will intensify, requiring policymakers, businesses, and communities to balance innovation with equity. The insights of Musk, Altman, and others provide a starting point, but the path to a sustainable and inclusive AI-driven future will demand thoughtful engagement and robust policy solutions. 

All the best, Zeljko Serdar. 

The Battery Breakthrough

As demand for clean energy grows, so does the need for smarter storage solutions. Lithium-ion batteries are leading the charge, but they don't last forever. That creates a big problem: what do we do with all the dead batteries? 

Thanks to a new method developed by researchers at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), we may finally have an answer. This scalable and eco-friendly recycling technique transforms old batteries back into high-performing, next-gen components, with minimal environmental impact. 

Let's break down how this innovation works and why it matters for a sustainable energy future.

The WPI researchers have developed a promising closed-loop recycling process for lithium-ion batteries, addressing the growing challenge of battery waste as clean energy demand surges. Here's a breakdown of the innovation and its significance based on available information:

How It WorksProcess Overview: 

The method, led by Yan Wang at WPI, uses a hydrometallurgical approach to recover valuable materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel from spent lithium-ion batteries. Unlike traditional recycling, which often involves energy-intensive smelting or produces significant waste, this technique employs water-based solutions with biodegradable acids (e.g., citric acid) to extract metals.

Key Steps:Battery Disassembly: 

Spent batteries are collected and dismantled to access the cathode and anode materials.

Material Extraction: 

A low-temperature, water-based process dissolves the battery components, recovering metals in the form of salts.

Regeneration: 

The extracted materials are processed into precursors for new cathode materials, such as lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC). These are then used to manufacture fresh batteries.

Closed-Loop System: 

The process minimizes waste by reusing chemicals and water, reducing environmental impact.

Scalability: 

The method is designed to be cost-effective and scalable, with a continuous recycling system that can handle large volumes of batteries. WPI's team has demonstrated this at a pilot scale, producing hundreds of kilograms of regenerated cathode materials.

Why It MattersEnvironmental Impact: 

Traditional recycling methods, like pyrometallurgy, burn batteries at high temperatures, emitting greenhouse gases and toxic byproducts. WPI’s process is eco-friendly, using biodegradable chemicals and producing minimal waste, aligning with sustainable energy goals.

Resource Scarcity: 

Lithium, cobalt, and nickel are finite and often mined in environmentally or ethically problematic ways. Recycling reduces reliance on new mining, with WPI’s method recovering up to 98% of key metals.

Battery Performance: 

Tests show that batteries made with recycled materials perform as well as, or better than, those made with virgin materials, maintaining capacity and cycle life critical for applications like electric vehicles (EVs) and grid storage.

Economic Viability: 

The process cuts costs by simplifying steps and reusing materials, making it attractive for industrial adoption. WPI’s spin-off, Ascend Elements, has raised significant funding (e.g., $542 million in 2023) to commercialize this technology, aiming for gigawatt-scale recycling facilities.

Broader ImplicationsCircular Economy: 

This innovation supports a circular battery economy, where materials are reused indefinitely, reducing waste and environmental degradation. It’s a critical step as EV adoption grows—global EV battery demand is projected to hit 3,500 GWh by 2030, generating millions of tons of spent batteries.

Energy Transition: 

Reliable, sustainable battery recycling ensures a steady supply of materials for clean energy storage, stabilizing supply chains and reducing geopolitical risks tied to mineral sourcing.

Challenges Ahead: 

While promising, scaling this technology requires infrastructure investment, regulatory support, and efficient battery collection systems. Standardizing battery designs could further streamline recycling.

My Thoughts:

This is a game-changer for the clean energy transition. The WPI method tackles the battery waste problem head-on with a practical, green solution that doesn’t sacrifice performance. Its scalability and low environmental footprint make it a strong candidate for widespread adoption, especially as battery production ramps up. However, success hinges on building robust collection networks and incentivizing recycling over landfilling. If Ascend Elements can deliver on its commercial promises, this could set a global standard for battery recycling, making clean energy truly sustainable. Zeljko Serdar, CCRES. 

Stvara li se to umjetna glad?

U EU se upravo istodobno širi afrička svinjska kuga (ASK), bedrenica, a kao posljednja se pojavila i bolest plavog jezika, a znak upitnika i potreba za zamisliti se je činjenica da pogađaju različite vrste životinja. 

Afrička svinjska kuga (ASK):  Ugrožene vrste: Domaće svinje i divlje svinje. Bolest je specifična za svinje i ne prenosi se na druge životinje niti na ljude. 

Bedrenica (antraks):  Ugrožene vrste: Prvenstveno goveda, ovce, koze, konji i svinje. Zoonoza je, što znači da se može prenijeti na ljude, ali je kod životinja često smrtonosna.

Bolest plavog jezika:  Ugrožene vrste: Preživači, uključujući ovce (najosjetljivije), goveda, koze, jelensku divljač i antilope. Prenosi se ugrizom zaraženih komaraca iz roda Culicoides.

Sve tri bolesti imaju značajan utjecaj na stočarstvo, ali svaka pogađa različite skupine životinja, s ASK-om ograničenim na svinje, bedrenicom koja pogađa širi spektar domaćih životinja, a bolesti plavog jezika koja cilja preživače. 

Pitanje o tome kome bi bilo u interesu stvaranje umjetne gladi složeno je i često ulazi u područje spekulacija, jer nema konkretnih dokaza da se bolesti poput afričke svinjske kuge (ASK), bedrenice ili bolesti plavog jezika namjerno šire u tu svrhu. Ipak, kad razmotrite potencijalne aktere i motive temeljene na ekonomskim, političkim i društvenim faktorima, uz naglasak da su ovo hipotetske rasprave, može se svašta zaključiti.

Geopolitički akteri:

Države ili trgovinski blokovi: Zemlje koje izvoze hranu mogle bi imati koristi od nestašica u drugim regijama. Na primjer, gubitak stoke u EU zbog ASK-a ili bolesti plavog jezika povećava ovisnost o uvozu mesa iz zemalja poput Brazila, SAD-a ili Australije, čime one ostvaruju gospodarsku prednost.

Primjer: Kina je nakon epidemije ASK-a 2018.–2019. uvelike povećala uvoz svinjetine, što je koristilo izvoznicima.

Korporacije u prehrambenoj industriji:

Proizvođači alternativnih proteina: Kompanije koje razvijaju biljne proteine, umjetno meso ili druge alternative mogle bi profitirati od smanjenja ponude tradicionalnog mesa zbog bolesti životinja. Nestašice mogu potaknuti potrošače na prelazak na njihove proizvode.

Trgovci robom: Špekulanti na tržištu poljoprivrednih proizvoda mogu zaraditi na volatilnosti cijena izazvanoj nestašicama, jer bolesti poput ASK-a značajno povećavaju cijene mesa.

Politički ili ideološki motivi:

Unutarnja kontrola. U teorijama zavjere, koje se često pojavljuju, tvrdi se da vlade ili elite žele izazvati nestašice hrane kako bi povećale ovisnost stanovništva o državnoj pomoći ili kontrolirale društvene nemire. Ove tvrdnje, međutim, nemaju čvrste dokaze.

Ekološke agende: 

Neke grupe ili politike (npr. u EU) koje zagovaraju smanjenje stočarstva zbog klimatskih ciljeva (smanjenje emisija CO2) mogle bi indirektno doprinijeti percepciji smanjenja proizvodnje hrane. Primjerice, regulacije o gnojivima ili pesticidima kritizirane su kao potencijalno štetne za poljoprivredu, iako su motivirane održivošću. 

Opet ja s teorijama urote i pod dojmom Alltechovog dokumentarnog filma “World without cows”  Svijet bez krava. Željko Serdar, HCOIE.

Path to Climate Neutrality

The EU’s Path to Climate Neutrality: A Strategy for Energy Autonomy and Competitiveness.

The European Union’s ambition to achieve climate neutrality by 2050 is a bold commitment that intertwines environmental sustainability with economic competitiveness and energy autonomy. With the 2030 milestone approaching, the urgency to reduce reliance on fossil fuels has never been greater. In 2023, the EU spent over EUR 430 billion on fossil fuel imports, funds that could be redirected to drive the clean energy transition. This shift is not just about mitigating climate change; it is a strategic move to enhance energy security, lower costs, and position the EU as a global leader in clean technology. The EU’s framework, including the Clean Industrial Deal and the Affordable Energy Action Plan, sets a clear path for decarbonization while fostering economic growth. The National Energy and Climate Plans (NECPs) are critical tools in this process, guiding Member States toward the 2030 targets of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% compared to 1990 levels, increasing renewable energy to 42.5% (with an aspiration for 45%), and improving energy efficiency by 11.7%. These plans, finalized by most Member States by April 2025, reflect significant progress, with projections indicating a 54% reduction in emissions by 2030. However, gaps remain, particularly in energy efficiency and land sector targets, requiring stronger implementation and additional measures. The EU has already demonstrated that climate action and economic growth can coexist. Since 1990, emissions have dropped by 37% while GDP has risen by 68%, driven by renewable energy expansion, energy efficiency improvements, and innovative technologies. In 2023, renewables accounted for 24% of energy production, and final energy consumption fell by 2% compared to 2014, despite a 38% GDP increase. Yet, challenges persist, including insufficient adaptation to climate risks, limited progress in phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, and uneven attention to just transition measures for vulnerable communities.To bridge these gaps, the EU must accelerate renewable energy deployment, streamline permitting processes, and enhance cross-border energy infrastructure. The Clean Industrial Deal offers incentives for clean tech manufacturing, while the Affordable Energy Action Plan aims to lower energy costs for citizens and businesses. Investments in grid modernization, energy storage, and carbon capture technologies are crucial to support a decarbonized, resilient energy system. Additionally, mobilizing private capital and phasing out fossil fuel subsidies will unlock resources for sustainable innovation. The NECPs highlight the importance of regional cooperation and public engagement to ensure a just transition. While Member States have improved consultation processes, more inclusive and transparent approaches are needed to involve all stakeholders. By aligning national strategies with EU goals, the bloc can reduce its dependence on external energy sources, strengthen industrial competitiveness, and build a sustainable future. The path to 2050 is challenging but achievable, with the NECPs serving as a roadmap for a cleaner, more autonomous, and prosperous Europe. Like and share to spread awareness! #EUClimateAction #CleanEnergy #Sustainability #EnergyTransition #ClimateNeutral2050 #RenewableEnergy #GreenEurope See Less OUTLINE: 00:00:00 EU Climate Ambition Introduction 00:00:57 Framework and Targets 00:01:42 Achievements and Challenges 00:02:16 Solutions and Future Path