Saturday, November 25, 2023

How is the mix of fuels used to produce electricity in the United States changing?

 


Forecast Overview

  • Global oil supply. We forecast global liquid fuels production will increase by 1.0 million barrels per day (b/d) in 2024. Ongoing OPEC+ production cuts will offset production growth from non-OPEC countries and help maintain a relatively balanced global oil market next year. Although the conflict between Israel and Hamas has not affected the physical oil supply at this point, uncertainties surrounding the conflict and other global oil supply conditions could put upward pressure on crude oil prices in the coming months. We forecast the Brent crude oil price will increase from an average of $90 per barrel (b) in the fourth quarter of 2023 to an average of $93/b in 2024.
  • U.S. gasoline consumption. U.S. gasoline consumption declined by 1% in 2024 in our forecast, which would result in the lowest per capita gasoline consumption in two decades. An increase in remote work in the United States, improvements in the fuel efficiency of the U.S. vehicle fleet, high gasoline prices, and persistently high inflation have reduced per capita gasoline demand.
  • Natural gas inventories. We estimate that U.S. natural gas inventories totaled 3,835 billion cubic (Bcf) feet at the end of October, 6% more than the five-year (2018–2022) average. We forecast U.S. natural gas inventories will end the winter heating season (November–March) 21% above the five-year average with almost 2,000 Bcf in storage. Inventories are full because of high natural gas production and warmer-than-average winter weather, which reduces demand for space heating in the commercial and residential sectors. We forecast the Henry Hub spot price to average near $3.20 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in November, down from a price of almost $5.50/MMBtu a year earlier.
  • Coal markets. U.S. coal exports have returned to pre-pandemic levels, driven by record-high global coal demand stemming primarily from Europe and Asia. We forecast that exports will rise to 97 million short tons (MMst) in 2023, because of increases in both steam and metallurgical coal exports. We expect steam coal exports to rise by 6 MMst compared with 2022 to 45 MMst in 2023 and metallurgical coal exports to increase by 6 MMst to reach 52 MMst over the same period. Despite this increase in coal exports, we expect U.S. production to fall by more than 100 MMst in 2024 due to reduced demand from the electric power sector. The decline in electricity generation from coal will be offset by an increase in electricity generation from renewable resources.
  • OPEC production capacity. Despite rising OPEC spare production capacity in 2023 and in 2024, we lowered our estimate of Iraq’s spare capacity by about 0.4 million b/d compared with last month’s STEO. We removed Iraq’s total production capacity assets in northern Iraq that relied on the northern Iraq-to-Türkiye pipeline for access to global markets. The pipeline has been out of commission since March 2023.


Notable Forecast Changes20232024

The current STEO forecast was released on November 7.
The previous STEO forecast was released on October 11.

OPEC surplus crude oil production capacity (current forecast) (million barrels per day)3.74.3
Previous forecast4.14.9
Percentage change-10.0%-12.0%
U.S. coal power demand (current forecast) (million short tons)384356
Previous forecast473342
Percentage change3.1%4.0%
U.S. coal production (current forecast) (million short tons)585480
Previous forecast581465
Percentage change0.7%3.2%

You can find more information in the detailed table of forecast changes.


data visualization of the top six energy sources used for U.S. electricity generation
Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, February 2023
Data values: U.S. electricity generation
Note: The six energy sources shown accounted for at least 98% of annual electricity generation from the electric power sector during this time period.

We expect that new renewables capacity—mostly wind and solar—will reduce electricity generation from both coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants in 2023 and 2024. Renewable generation capacity additions in our STEO are less uncertain than other forecasts because we survey this information monthly. However, the electricity actually generated from both renewable and nonrenewable sources varies based on weather conditions and market dynamics. It’s this aspect of our STEO electricity generation forecast where most of the uncertainty lies.

Wind and solar accounted for 14% of U.S. electricity generation in 2022. In our February Short-Term Energy Outlook, we forecast that wind and solar will rise slightly, accounting for 16% of total generation in 2023 and 18% in 2024. Electricity generation from coal falls from 20% in 2022 to 17% in both 2023 and 2024. Natural gas accounted for 39% of electric power sector electricity generation last year, and we forecast its share to be similar in 2023 and then fall to 37% in 2024.

Electricity generation from renewable energy sources has been growing steadily in the United States over the past decade. Last year, electric power generation from all types of renewables accounted for nearly one-quarter of total generation by the U.S. electric power sector.

Renewables' output tends to follow capacity additions

two-panel data visualization showing the relationship between generating capacity and electricity generation from wind, hydro, and solar
Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, February 2023
Data values: U.S. generating capacityU.S. electricity generation

The increase in renewables generation is being driven primarily by investment in new solar and wind generating capacity. The U.S. electric power sector operated about 73 gigawatts (GW) of solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity at the end of 2022. Power generators are reporting plans to expand solar capacity by 43% (32 GW) in 2023, which would be the largest percentage increase in solar capacity since 2016. Solar capacity will increase an additional 30% (31 GW) in 2024.

We expect U.S. wind capacity to increase 5% in each of the next two years, 6 GW in 2023 and 7 GW in 2024. Many solar and wind projects tend to come online in December, so these capacity additions tend to have the most impact on generation in the following year.

We compile information about existing and future capacity on our Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory, which is based on our monthly survey. When companies report plans for future capacity on these surveys, the projects are generally already in the development process. Although projects may experience delays, the majority of projects reported as future builds eventually come online.

We forecast coal generation to decline this year because the power sector is starting out in 2023 with about 5% (11 GW) less coal-fired capacity than at the beginning of 2022. U.S. natural gas-fired capacity rose by 3 GW over the past year, but that represents a less than 1% increase. Unlike electricity generation from renewable sources, generation from natural gas and coal are more affected by relative fuel costs.

Sources of uncertainty: weather and fuel costs

Two leading factors that make our electricity forecasts especially uncertain are future weather and fuel costs. Our forecast uses temperature outlooks from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Temperatures directly affect overall electricity demand.

Electricity demand typically peaks in the summer when homes and businesses use air conditioning. Over the last 10 years, July 2020 saw the most monthly population-weighted U.S. cooling degree days at 397 cooling degree days; the most heating degree days were in January 2014, at 971 heating degree days. Electricity demand increases less during winter months because about 40% of U.S. households use electricity for their primary space heating needs.

data visualization of the relationship between temperature and electricity demand
Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Short-Term Energy Outlook, February 2023
Data values: U.S. electricity generationWeather data

Variability in weather also leads to uncertainty in renewable generation. Our forecast assumes historically typical operating conditions for wind and solar, but weather conditions can cause output from both sources to vary significantly. Similarly, variations in precipitation can lead to uncertainty in hydropower generation. In 2021, California’s drought caused the state’s hydropower output to fall 48% below the previous 10-year average. More recently, precipitation along the West Coast increased snowpack, which will likely lead to higher-than-normal hydroelectric generation in California this year.

Natural gas prices are one of the primary factors that determine generation levels from existing coal and natural gas-fired power plants. Natural gas prices have also been one of the most uncertain aspects of the STEO forecast. In the past two months, the daily spot price of Henry Hub natural gas ranged from $7.20 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) in mid-December to $2.65/MMBtu at the end of January.

In our current outlook, we forecast the Henry Hub price to rise slightly throughout 2023, from $3.05/MMBtu in February to $4.11/MMBtu in December. However, if natural gas prices are higher than we expect, natural gas-fired generation could decline and coal generation could remain relatively flat. 

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. 

The U.S. Energy Information Administration is committed to its free and open data by making it available through an Application Programming Interface (API) and its open data tools. EIA's API is multi-faceted and contains the following time-series data sets organized by the main energy categories.

U.S. Energy Information Administration
1000 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, DC 20585

Wednesday, November 8, 2023

HAARP experiments caused artificial aurora over Croatia this weekend.




Here, if no one wants to tell you, I will. HAARP experiments caused artificial aurora over Croatia this weekend.


Watchers of the night sky along much of Croatia catch a red splotch of light up high over the weekend. Though it might look like the aurora, the red “airglow” in the ionosphere is a byproduct of a rare, four-day-long set of experiments at the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program — or HAARP — in Gakona.

“Each day, the airglow could be visible up to 300 ... miles from the HAARP facility,” according to a statement from the Geophysical Institute at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

By creating an artificial aurora with equipment on the ground, researchers hope to learn more about the natural aurora.

HAARP is composed of instruments designed to study the ionosphere, the area roughly 50 to 400 miles above Earth, separating the livable surface of the planet from space.

High-frequency radio pulses will excite electrons in the ionosphere, artificially mimicking the same phenomenon that causes the northern lights naturally from solar energy kicked off by the sun.

UAF and several out-of-state research programs are conducting the experiments. “Scientists will investigate ionosphere mechanisms that cause optical emissions,” according to the statement. “And they’ll investigate how satellites can use plasma waves in the ionosphere for collision detection and avoidance.”






One application of the research is developing a new method for tracking “space junk,” the remnants of man-made objects like old launch vehicles or bits of spacecraft trapped in Earth’s orbit, according to Paul Bernhardt, HAARP’s chief scientist.

“Traditionally, space debris is observed with satellite and ground sensors that use optics and ranging radars. These methods, however, cannot detect many smaller debris. University scientists have suggested a novel technique for locating space debris by measuring the electric fields that surround them while in motion,” Bernhardt said.

The HAARP site is about 200 miles northeast of Anchorage and about 230 miles southeast of Fairbanks, two of the state’s main population centers.

A much smaller version of the experiment took place in 2017, with researchers using ground equipment to stimulate an artificial aurora “the size of a thumbnail at arm’s length,” according to a university publication.

“The angle of visibility for anyone wanting to look for it will depend on a person’s distance from HAARP,” the Geophysical Institute said in this week’s statement. “Because of how the human eye operates, the airglow might be easier to see when looking just to the side.”

“Clear skies make for the best viewing. If visible, it will look like a broad airglow cloud,” said HAARP Director Jessica Matthews.

Though the experiments have a tentative schedule, Matthews cautioned they are subject to ionospheric and geomagnetic conditions and could be rescheduled or canceled if those are not met.






The work is part of a $9.3 million grant from the National Science Foundation to learn more about the upper atmosphere and geospace.

Initially developed by the U.S. military, HAARP has long been the subject of conspiracy theories. After control of the facility was transferred to the University of Alaska in 2015, officials there began hosting an annual open house event in the hopes of dispelling those notions. For everyone else who puts their head in the sand, keep following the mainstream media. Željko Serdar