Friday, March 25, 2011

SOLAR MARKET by CCRES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES


Japan's Quake to Shake the Solar Market?

As Japan grapples with the likelihood of a nuclear power disaster as a result of the huge earthquake and tsunami, investors are betting on solar as a more benign form of alternative energy. While solar stocks are going up and up, the impact of Japan's crisis may not be so sunny for the solar market in the coming year.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.

Shares of American and Chinese solar companies, such as First Solar, SunPower, Suntech Power and JA Solar, rose around 7-11 percent Tuesday. The climb was a sharp contrast to many other stocks in the U.S. market that fell as worries deepened among investors that Japan may not be able to prevent a nuclear power reactor meltdown, which would release high levels of radiation into the atmosphere. A nuclear crisis will delay its recovery from the quake and tsunami, and Japan plays a key role in the global economy as a major supplier of consumer electronics and cars.

Before the 9.0 earthquake hit Japan last Friday, nuclear power was gaining support in the United States as a good alternative to power from coal. President Obama mentioned nuclear power in his State of the Union address in January this year, and both Republican and Democratic lawmakers have shown their support in varying degrees. What’s happening in Japan will certainly intensify debates over the safety of nuclear power. And that makes solar seem a safer bet.

But how the quake and tsunami change the dynamics of the solar market in the next 12 months is difficult to gauge, particularly in the early days of the crisis. We are seeing different takes on the longer term impact from market analysts and companies. Market research firm, DisplaySearch, noted that most of the factories for silicon, wafers and solar cells are located around central and southern Japan, not in the northern region that was directly hit by the quake and tsunami.

Some equity analysts, such as Barclays Capital’s Vishal Shah, say lawmakers might pass policies more favorable for solar now that nuclear power seems a more risky bet. Others, including Axiom Capital’s Gordon Johnson, don’t see that direct impact. In a research note, Piper Jaffray’s Ahmar Zaman writes that demand for solar energy in Japan, among the top 5 markets in the world, will fall this year as the country focuses its resources on reconstruction and other recovery measures. As a result, Japanese solar companies will try to sell products it originally pegged for the domestic market in other parts of the world and push down the average selling prices of solar panels.

Solar companies with factories in Japan are mostly reporting minimal damage to their equipment and buildings, though some may have suspended their production because of a lack of water and electricity. Taiwan-based AUO Optronics did just that at M. Setek, which produces silicon and turn silicon into wafers in northern Japan.

Solar Frontier, which recently opened its 900-megawatt factory to produce copper-indium-gallium-selenide thin films, said its factories are located far enough that they weren’t affected by the quake and tsunami. Sharp said its factories didn’t sustain major damage, but the full impact on its operations remains to be seen.

While factory equipment is in good shape, the transportation system for shipping materials and products may not be. That is likely to cause a bigger headache for manufacturers, said HIS iSuppli. Solar Frontier certainly pointed to this potential problem in its announcement: “Our supply chain appears to be intact at this time, but we are but we are reviewing all incoming and outgoing logistics as ports around Japan are recovering from the events of Friday.”More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.

SunPower, which buys silicon from Japanese companies, said it won’t change the anticipated production volumes for 2011. SunPower said Japanese suppliers provide less than 10 percent of what it needs for the second quarter, and it will be able to find alternative sources if its Japanese suppliers aren’t able to deliver.
CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Thursday, March 24, 2011

ETHANOL CCRES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES


Ethanol (Ethyl Alcohol or Grain Alcohol) is commonly used in alcohol. The recent surge in interest for alternative fuel sources is driving research to use Ethanol as a transportation fuel source. The articles on this page deal with this form of ethanol use. There is still a great deal of debate about the pros and cons of ethanol as fuel. Ethanol is commonly used as a fuel source additive and not as a fuel substitute.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.



Ocean Ethanol LLC has a solution for global warming and reducing the dependence on foreign based oil imports. CO2 can be converted to ethanol, methanol, butanol and with further processing to gasoline, biodiesel and ethylene. Based on using a miniplant (via the modular block) Ocean Ethanol hopes to develop green energy from CO2.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.



To increase mileage by a third in just three years.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.

Ethanol plants are changing farming across the Midwest. The last time there was such a dramatic shift in agriculture was “when electricity came to the rural people” in the 1930s and ’40s, says Dave Hughes, president of the township board and a farmer who invested in the plant.

Casey bought his shares in the ethanol biorefinery for $1,000 each three years ago. They’re now worth almost $4,000 each. Like the other 950 shareholders in the cooperative, he has gotten $400 in dividends for each share since the plant opened in April 2005.

That’s not the only way his bottom line is being helped. Casey is selling part of his corn crop this fall to the plant for 17 cents a bushel more than he was offered elsewhere. He also saves fuel when he hauls his corn just down the road instead of trucking it to an elevator miles away. Because of the plant’s proximity, the value of his land has increased. “When I get old, that’ll be pretty nice,” he says.

The United Wisconsin Grain Producers plant here employs 36 people, all but two of them from the area. Hourly workers make about $35,000 a year and get profit sharing, incentive pay and full benefits, CEO Jeff Robertson says.

Rising gas prices and the push for less dependence on foreign oil have increased demand for ethanol, which is made by converting the starch in corn into sugars that are fermented and distilled. When it’s blended with gasoline, ethanol can reduce carbon monoxide emissions. Legislation signed by President Bush last year added urgency: It requires oil refiners to use 4 billion gallons of renewable fuel this year and 7.5 billion gallons by 2012.

Those factors have created a rapidly expanding industry that is centered in the rural Midwest.

There are 105 ethanol plants in operation; almost half are owned by local farmers, according to the Renewable Fuels Association, an industry group. Forty-one more are under construction, and seven are expanding. Capacity is 5 billion gallons a year. When the new plants are running, that number will grow to 7.9 billion.

Many small ethanol producers qualify for federal and state tax credits and loan guarantees.

“I think the boom will continue,” says Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Association. “The nation needs to have more domestic renewable energy, and ethanol is going to satisfy a big part of that. … Farmers ought to be re-evaluating what they are planting and responding to the market signals.”

That’s happening here. Corn into cash.

Before the plant opened, Casey planted corn on two-thirds of his 1,500 acres and soybeans on the rest. This year, he moved 20% of his soybean acreage into corn.

Even though it can cost more to grow corn than soybeans because of the cost of fertilizer, Hughes also has shifted more of his 740 acres into corn. The plant, he says, “has changed a lot of things. A lot, and they’re all positive.” Some area farmers who didn’t invest in the plant, Hughes says, “are kicking themselves in the fanny.”

Friesland’s 303 residents have embraced the plant, but not every town is as welcoming. Before settling on the site just off state Highway 33 here, organizers considered locating in Arlington, says Bill Herrmann, president of the United Wisconsin Grain Producers’ board. The concerns of residents there about noise, odor and possible effects on a bird sanctuary prompted them to drop those plans.

Bruce Braaksma, owner of Royal Lumber here, says the plant isn’t much of a nuisance. The 100 or so trucks that enter the plant daily don’t usually go through town, he says. “If it’s dead still, you can hear just a little bit of a hum, and the wind has to be just right to smell it. It smells like an old tavern,” he says.

Besides, Braaksma says, most people in town have been won over by a decline in property taxes since the plant was built. “When your property taxes go down $200 to $300, everybody’s got a smile on their face,” he says.

The plant produces about 50 million gallons of ethanol a year. An expansion that will increase production to 80 million by the end of 2007 is underway. “The profitability of the company is such that this is happening earlier than anybody planned,” Robertson says.

“The presence of an ethanol plant really does ripple through the entire economy,” says Geoff Cooper, ethanol analyst at the National Corn Growers Association. “With the current rate of growth that we’re seeing, that’s going to continue for the next several years.”

Reliance on oil continues. There are some doubts that alternative fuels can end the country’s dependence on foreign oil. For years, studies showed that more energy is required to produce ethanol than is saved when it’s used in gasoline. A University of Minnesota study released in July concluded that ethanol and biodiesel made from soybeans return more energy than is consumed in growing the grains and distilling them into fuel.

The study estimated that using all corn and soybeans grown in the USA for ethanol and biodiesel would offset only 12% of gasoline demand and 6% of diesel demand. In 2005, the U.S. Agriculture Department says, ethanol accounted for about 3% of the nation’s gasoline consumption.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com.

Ray Defenbaugh, president of Big River Resources, a farmer-owned ethanol plant in West Burlington, Iowa, says weaning the nation from foreign oil is important, but his priorities are closer to home.

“We want to create jobs for youth, preserve the community and provide a good return to the investor. The money we make goes right back into the community,” he says. “That’s the reason we built it.”

Casey says his goal is to help himself and other farmers: “It’s more about the end product for ourselves, to have a place to sell our corn, so we can stay in business.”

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Skyline Doubles Solar Concentration CCRES


CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES


The Mountain View, Calif.-based company announced the launch of its new concentrator Tuesday and dubbed it Skyline X14 System. The X14 refers to the system’s ability to concentrate the sun 14 times, which doubles the concentration of its previous system, said Tim Keating, vice president of marketing and field operations at Skyline. Skyline executives used to say its gen 1 technology could concentrate the sun 10 times, but turned out that figure actually included power that could be generated from using a tracker.

Each Skyline X14 system runs 11.6 meters long; the distance from bottom to the top of the mirrors is 2.6 meters. The system contains 20 solar panels with a total of 3.6 kilowatts of generation capacity.

Like the previous system, Skyline X14 still uses monocrystalline silicon cells and sits on a single-axis tracker that tilts the mirrors to follow the sun’s movement. It even uses the same metal fin for passive cooling. Silicon cells lose their efficiencies when they get too hot, and most of the sun’s energy becomes heat that needs to be dissipated (generally, monocrystalline silicon cells run between 18-20 percent efficiency).The cooling fin only needs to be “slightly larger” than the one for the previous system, Keating said. In fact, the fin for the previous design might have been too big for the job, he added.

What is markedly different with Skyline X14 is the use of glass mirrors. These are curved mirrors that look similar to what concentrating solar thermal developers use for their parabolic trough systems, Keating said. Why switch from aluminum reflectors to the glass version? Keating said there are three key reasons: glass has become cheaper; it can generally reflect a slightly higher percentage of light; and it’s a more bankable material.

Glass mirrors still aren’t as cheap as metal reflectors, Keating noted, but they are worth the cost because the system is designed to double its concentrating ability. Project investors would consider glass an older tech because it’s been used in concentrating solar thermal power plants for a few decades now, including the world’s largest: the 354-megawatt SEGS in California. Still, companies such as 3M are working on coatings and other technologies to boost metal reflector’s reflectivity.

Skyline plans to use X14 in three projects. Two of them, at 100 kilowatts each, will be built at the Edward Air Force Base in California and Fort Bliss in Texas under a $1.58 million contract.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com

The third project is a newly announced 500-kilowatt system in the Mexican state of Durango. Skyline will supply the equipment to contractor DelSol Systems. DelSol is building it at a new industrial park for the Durango government, a project that reportedly will cost $28 million pesos. (US $2.3 million) The plan is to start construction within 60 days and complete project by the end of the year, Keating said. Durango has expressed an interest to expand the project to 10 megawatts, he added.

Skyline has steadily increased the sizes of its projects, and the one in Durango is the largest announced to date. It unveiled a pilot sytem with its first-generation technology, a 27-kilowatt system, in Silicon Valley in May 2009. Founded in 2007, the venture-backed company is among a slew of CPV technology developers who set out to provide an alternative to conventional solar panels, which at the time commanded higher prices largely because silicon price was high. The price has fallen more than half since, and that in turn has made solar panels more attractive to project developers and financiers.

This silicon price decline happened during the time when many CPV technology companies were rolling out their first system. As a result, these companies have struggled to compete. As new technology providers, they have to amass large enough sales volumes in order to drive down manufacturing costs quickly.

Skyline claims its X14 can produce electricity at less than $0.10 per kilowatt-hour. But that only happens under certain conditions: the project has to be at least 1 megawatt and take advantage of the federal incentive that covers 30 percent of the project’s cost, Keating said. It also has to land in places with a super sunny climate that can provide a DNI (direct normal irradiance) of more than 6.0 kilowatt hour/m²/day.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com

“There has been a continuing interest in this space and projects are getting built,” Keating said. “We are mostly an alternative to the flat-plate system. For the same amount of money, you can buy a Skyline system with 20-30 percent more capacity.”
CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

World Water Day by CCRES


CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES


World Water Day, a Call for Innovation


By 2030, water supplies may satisfy only 60 percent of demand, notes Dow’s Snehal Desai. Here are some ideas for closing the gap.
.



This year’s United Nations World Water Day, taking place March 22, is dedicated to the theme of “Water for Cities: Responding to the Urban Challenge.” Around the world, many cultures are undergoing a tectonic shift from largely agrarian and rural living to dense urban living. According to Triumph of the City[1], more than half of the global population in 2011 will be urban.

Along with the benefits of urbanization, including lower environmental impact, come challenges such as how to provide large, dense and growing populations with clean water for an increasingly growing middle-class society with corresponding expectations.

Chances are you are at least somewhat aware of the growing water scarcity problem, particularly for urban populations, but if you aren’t, here is a quick recap:

- Under an average economic growth scenario and without efficiency gains, global water requirements will grow from 4,500 billion cubic meters today to nearly 7,000 billion cubic meters -- representing more than half of all the water in Lake Superior and a 50 percent increase -- in only twenty years.

- By 2030, some analysts predict that available water supplies will satisfy only 60 percent of demand.[2]

- According to the World Economic Forum, nearly 60% of the world’s population will be living in cities by that time, causing a shortage of clean water for people and businesses in urban environments worldwide.[3]

- In that same time period, one-third of the global human population will have only half the water required to meet basic needs[4], a situation that is likely to impact food production and agriculture, which account for more than 70 percent of water usage[5].

- Ceres, an environmental research and sustainability group, 24/7 Wall St., and the National Resources Defense Council have all stated that 10 of America's biggest cities are in severe danger of water shortages in the relatively near future.

The bulk of the conversation around water today focuses on the scope of the problem, governance and policy. In terms of clean technology, the focus is disproportionately placed on energy over water.More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com

However, now more than ever, a focus on innovation is necessary to tackle our water problems throughout the world. Not only do we need to think about innovation in water processing, but we also need to look through an energy lens when we consider water solutions. Water and energy are deeply intertwined in what is referred to as the 'water-energy nexus.' In short, energy is required to generate clean water and a great deal of water is used to generate energy (accounting for almost 40 percent of all fresh water withdrawals in the U.S., according to NREL). There are some forward-looking cities that are leading on solving the energy-nexus equation -- some out of necessity. These examples are instructive to other communities facing the same issues of growing population, shrinking water supplies and increasing energy costs.

- Ashkelon, Israel boasts the largest desalinization plant in the world, which provides more than 15% of the water needs of Israel from the Mediterranean Sea. This plant is an example of how water-energy innovations can work in concert to reduce cost. Energy costs are greatly reduced by using outgoing effluent to help pressure incoming seawater. As a result of this and other innovations in reverse osmosis, the plant produces clean water at a cost of 60 to 70 U.S. cents/m3 compared to most desalinization plants, which cost out at 80 to 90 cents/m3.

- Singapore recovers a high percentage of its water from domestic use, which it purifies and sells to industry. This allows the island nation to effectively manage a closed loop on industrialized and urbanized water. As a self-contained city state, this measure has helped reduce reliance on water imported from Malaysia and has been deemed an important development for national resource independence. Although primarily produced for industrial use, the water is purified to drinking quality using dual membrane microfiltration and reverse osmosis technologies, and is marketed as bottled water for human consumption under the consumer brand NEWater.

- Chandler, Arizona, as part of its LEED certification process, partnered with Intel to achieve aggressive water conservation goals that would benefit both the business community and the residents of the arid region whose water supply that Intel and other area businesses draw upon. As a result of internally reclaiming much of its own industrial wastewater for uses ranging from its fab to its cooling towers and even its landscaping irrigation, Intel’s Ocotillo campus recycles and reuses upward of 75 percent of its water.[6] Intel has also worked with the city’s own reverse osmosis plant to recharge upward of 3.5 billion gallons of drinking-quality water and put it back into Arizona's aquifers. Over the last ten years, that $100 million water conservation investment has recycled some 90,000 acre-feet of water -- enough water for more than 280,000 homes for a year and the equivalent of all the water that goes over Niagara Falls in 11 hours.

As we can see from these examples, our water problems can’t be solved without the types of innovations that simultaneously reduce the energy impacts of generating clean water, provide new technologies targeted to populations with low-grade sources or infrastructure, and combine a number of technologies together so that any source of water can be converted to any required quality level at an optimized water and energy cost.

For more details on the water-energy nexus as it relates to urban growth, please see “A Different Look at Water Part I – Water for Cities and the Water-Energy Nexus.” http://www.dowwaterandprocess.com/

More info at http://solarserdar.blogspot.com


Snehal Desai serves as the Global Marketing Director for Dow Chemical Company’s Water and Process Solutions Business

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[1] Edward Glaeser. Triumph of the City (New York: Penguin, 2011)


[2] Snehal Desai, “The Sustainability Challenge: Meeting the Needs of the Water-Energy Nexus” (Whitepaper for Dow Water & Process Solutions, January 2011).


[3] World Economic Forum Water Initiative, “The Bubble is Close to Bursting: A Forecast of the Main Economic and Geopolitical Water Issues Likely to Arise in the World During the Next Two Decades” (Draft for discussion at the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting, Davos, January 2009).


[4] Daily Mail Reporter, “Water demand will ‘outstrip supply by 40% within 20 years’ due to climate change and population growth,” Daily Mail, March 1, 2011, accessed March 15, 2011 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1361374/Water-demand-outstrip-supply-40-20-years-climate-change-population-growth.html#


[5] “Statistics,” Stockholm International Water Institute, accessed March 15, 2011 http://www.siwi.org/sa/node.asp?node=159

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Water Conservation Tips CCRES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES



Top Water Conservation Tips

No drips A dripping faucet can waste 20 gallons of water a day. A leaking toilet can use 90,000 gallons of water in a month. Get out the wrench and change the washers on your sinks and showers, or get new washerless faucets. Keeping your existing equipment well maintained is probably the easiest and cheapest way to start saving water.
Install new fixtures
New, low-volume or dual flush toilets, low-flow showerheads, water-efficient dishwashers and clothes washing machines can all save a great deal of water and money. Aerators on your faucets can significantly reduce water volume; water-saving showerheads can cut the volume of water used down to 1.2 gallons per minute or less, and some even have a "pause button" to let you stop the water while soaping up or shampooing. Our interns recently pointed out that "spending about $30 on low-flow showerheads and faucets is estimated to save 45 gallons of that 260 gallons of water [used in a typical household per day], almost 18% of your usage. Splurging on a low-flow toilet could save another 50-80 gallons of water a day. Together, those changes nearly cut in half the household's daily use, saving a considerable amount of water - and passing that savings on to your water bill, as well as your water heating bill."
Cultivate good water habits
All the water that goes down the drain, clean or dirty, ends up mixing with raw sewage, getting contaminated, and meeting the same fate. Try to stay aware of this precious resource disappearing and turn off the water while brushing your teeth or shaving and always wash laundry and dishes with full loads. When washing dishes by hand, fill up the sink and turn off the water. Take shorter showers or, as the old joke goes, shower with a friend: Treehugger TV shows you how. To put things in perspective, take a quick look at your next water bill when it arrives. It probably won't be costing you too much, but the average household consumes multiple thousands of gallons each month. See if you can make this number go down. If you're the graphing type, go nuts.
Stay off the bottle
By many measures, bottled water is a scam. In most first-world countries, the tap water is provided by a government utility and is tested regularly. (You can look up your water in the National Tap Water Quality Database) Taste tests have shown that in many municipalities, tap water actually tastes better. Bottled water is not as well regulated and studies have shown that it is not even particularly pure. A four-year study of bottled water in the U.S. conducted by NRDC found that one-fifth of the 103 water products tested contained synthetic organic chemicals such as the neurotoxin xylene and the possible carcinogen and neurotoxin styrene. (Grist) Much bottled water doesn"t come from a "Artesian springs" and is just tap water anyhow. (Coca-Cola adds salt to its Dasani water to make it taste better, just like fast food.) Not only is it more expensive per gallon than gasoline, bottled water incurs a huge carbon footprint from its transportation, and the discarded bottles are a blight. It's no wonder that some people even think it's a sin. If you want to carry your water with you, get a bottle and fill it. (Look here for some advise on durable, non-toxic container options.) If your water at home tastes funny, try an activated charcoal or ceramic filter. Here is a comparison of home-use water filters from Grist.
Go beyond the lawn
Naturalize it using locally appropriate plants that are hardy and don't need a lot of water. If you have to water, do it during the coolest part of the day or at night to minimize evaporation. Here is a useful calculator to figure out landscape water use. Xeriscaping is a method of landscaping that utilizes only native and low water plants. It is an especially appropriate approach for states like California and Arizona where people often plant lawns like they live in Florida despite living in the desert.

Harvest your rainwater
Put a rain barrel on your downspouts and use this water for irrigation. Rain cisterns come in all shapes and sizes ranging from larger underground systems to smaller, freestanding ones. Some even glow!
Harvest your greywater
Water that has been used at least once but is still clean enough for other jobs is called greywater. Water from sinks, showers, dishwashers, and clothes washers are the most common household examples. (Toilet water is often called "blackwater" and needs a different level of treatment before it can be reused.) Greywater can be recycled with practical plumbing systems like the Aqus, or with simple practices such as emptying the fish tank in the garden instead of the sink. The bottom line? One way or another, avoid putting water down the drain when you can use it for something else.
At the car wash
Car washes are often more efficient than home washing and treat their water rather than letting it straight into the sewer system. But check to make sure that they clean and recycle the water. Better yet, try the waterless car wash. If you live in Manchester, the Levenshulme Baptist Church is recycling water from its Baptistery pool for charity car washes http://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/08/baptismal_water.php .
Keep your eyes open
Report broken pipes, open hydrants, and excessive waste. Don't be shy about pointing out leaks to your friends and family members, either. They might have tuned out the dripping sound a long time ago.
Don't spike the punch
Water sources have to be protected. In many closed loop systems like those in cities around the Great Lakes, waste water is returned to the Lake that fresh water comes out of. Don't pour chemicals down drains, or flush drugs down toilets; it could come back in diluted form in your water.

Water Conservation Facts: By the Numbers

2.5 gallons: The amount of water per person much of the world is allocated.
400 gallons: The amount of water per person used by the average American citizen; 30 percent of this is used for outdoor purposes, such as watering the lawn.
70 percent: The amount of worldwide water use that is allocated to farming; most of these farming irrigation systems operate at only 40 percent efficiency. According to a 2002 article by Lester Brown, aquifers are depleting all over the world--in China by 2-3 metres per year. In the US, the Ogallala aquifer is shrinking rapidly. In India, aquifers are going down by 3 metres per year, in Mexico by 3.3 meters per year.
263: The number of rivers that either cross or demarcate international political boundaries, in addition to countless aquifers. According to the Atlas of International Freshwater Agreement, 90 percent of countries in the world must share these water basins with at least one or two other states. Major conflicts such as Darfur have been connected to water shortages, and lack of access to clean water.
1430: Gallons of water per capita in the United States; only 100 gallons of that is household use per person as most is used for agriculture, according to water expert Peter Gleick.
88 percent: Of deaths from diarrhea are caused from unsafe drinking water, inadequate availability of water for hygiene, and lack of access to sanitation; this translates to more than 1.5 million of the 1.9 million children under five who perish from diarrhea each year. This amounts to 18% of all under-five deaths and means that more than 4,000 children are dying every day as a result of diarrhoeal diseases.
$11.3 billion: The amount of money required to provide basic levels of service for drinking and waste water in Africa and Asia.
$35 billion: the amount of money spent on bottled water in the most developed countries in the world.
1.5 million: Barrels of crude oil used for making PET water bottles, globally. This is enough oil to fuel 100,000 American cars for a year.
2.7 tons: The amount of plastic used to bottle water. 86 percent become garbage or litter.

Water Conservation: Getting Techie

Where does it come from?
The water cycle is the process by which water circulates around, over, and through the Earth. It is driven by the sun, evaporating water from the oceans, rising through the atmosphere and condensing as pure water or snow. About 505,000 cubic kilometers of water fall on the earth each year, 398,000 over the oceans. The pure water is stored as ice, as water in lakes, and in aquifers that have taken thousands of years to fill. 97% of water is stored in the oceans; 2% in the ice caps; only 1% is in lakes, groundwater or other useable sources. We draw on surface water (lakes and rivers) subsurface (groundwater through pumping) and a small amount is made (very expensively) through desalination. Read more about the water cycle at Wikipedia.

What is done to it?
Sometimes very little. Where the water sources are pure, like in New York City, very little is actually necessary. Other municipalities put their water through a three stage system of Primary Treatment (collecting and screening), Secondary Treatment (removal of solids and contaminants using filters and coagulation), and Tertiary Treatment (carbon filtering and disinfection). It is then stored in reservoirs or water towers so that it can be gravity-fed through the system.

Is it really pure?
While the consensus is that, overall, tap water is better than bottled water for you and the environment, there are some concerns. Older houses and apartment buildings may have lead plumbing which can contaminate it via pipes, solder, and old brass fittings. There is also a growing convern about low levels of antibiotics from agriculture and people disposing of medication down the toilet. Gender-bender hormones from birth control pills, along with phthalates from vinyl, are entering the water system and changing the sex of fish http://www.raysapoint.com/contra.html , lowering the sperm count of men, and doubling the number of annual male breast reduction surgeries.

Where does it go?
Too often, waster is just dumped. Often it enters combined systems that are overwhelmed when it rains. Where there is sewage treatment it is of variable quality, but a properly run modern plant can produce results that are fairly effective. The systems are designed to mimic natural treatment processes where bacteria consume the organic contaminants, and it can then be returned to lakes or as groundwater. Unfortunately, in sub-Saharan Africa almost no waste water is treated; in Latin America only about 15% is. The price is paid in diarrhea, typhus and cholera.

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

How Does Nuclear Radiation Harm CCRES


CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES



How Does Nuclear Radiation Harm the Body?

The amount of radioactive material being released from the damaged nuclear reactors in Japan, and the eventual impact it will have on human health, are still being determined.

How does nuclear radiation harm the body, and what are the risks from long-term exposure to low levels after an accident? MyHealthNewsDaily spoke with experts about these questions.

How does radiation harm the body?




About 150 people living or working around Japan's damaged nuclear facilities have been monitored for potential radiation exposure, and 23 have been found to be in need of treatment. How is the extent of their exposure measured?

According to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), "exposure" refers to the amount of radiation, such as X-rays, gamma rays, neutrons, alpha and beta particles, present in the air. Exposure, usually expressed in units of roentgens, is measured by Geiger counters and similar devices. A Geiger counter registers how much the gas it contains gets ionized by incoming particles of radiation, and converts that information into an electronic signal.

People don't absorb all the radiation they're exposed to, however; most of it passes straight through their bodies. A small amount of the energy carried by radiation gets absorbed by bodily tissues, and that absorbed amount is measured in units of "radiation absorbed dose" (rad). Radiation affects different people in different ways, but a rule of thumb used by safety crews is that a single roentgen of gamma- or x-ray exposure typically produces an absorbed dose of approximately 1 rad. By measuring the radiation level around a person's body using a Geiger counter, a safety officer can approximate that person's absorbed dose.

There's been some reported evidence that radioactive iodine and cesium are being released into the environment from the malfunctioning nuclear reactors in Japan, said Kathryn Higley, director of the Oregon State University department of nuclear engineering and radiation health physics.

As radioactive material decays, or breaks down, the energy released into the environment has two ways of harming a body that is exposed to it, Higley said. It can directly kill cells, or it can cause mutations to DNA. If those mutations are not repaired, the cell may turn cancerous.

Radioactive iodine tends to be absorbed by the thyroid gland and can cause thyroid cancer, said Dr. Lydia Zablotska, an assistant professor in the department of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California, San Francisco.

But radioactive iodine is short-lived and will be around for only about two months after an accident, said Andre Bouville of the National Cancer Institute, who has studied radiation doses from the fallout of the 1986 Chernobyl explosion in Ukraine. So, if the exposure to the air comes after that time, radioactive iodine does not pose a health risk, Bouville said.

Children are most at risk for thyroid cancer, since their thyroid glands are 10 times smaller than those of adults, he said. The radioactive iodine would be more concentrated in them.

Radioactive cesium, on the other hand, can stay in the environment for more than a century. But it does not concentrate in one part of the body the way radioactive iodine does.

The Chernobyl accident released a plume of radioactive materials into the atmosphere in a fraction of a second. In the following years, the incidence of thyroid cancer among those exposed as children increased in Ukraine and nearby countries, Zablotska said. The cancer showed up between four and 10 years after the accident, Bouville said.

Children were exposed to radioactive material mainly from eating contaminated leafy vegetables and dairy. There have been no detectable health effects from exposure to radioactive cesium after the accident.

In general, it takes a pretty high dose of radiation to increase cancer risk, Higley said. For instance, there were reports that one Japanese worker was exposed to 10 rem (100 millisievert, mSV), a measurement of radiation dose. From that exposure, his lifetime cancer risk would go up about half a percent, Higley said. According to Higley, the dose is the equivalent of about five CT scans. Americans are exposed to about 0.3 rem (3 mSv) each year from natural sources, such as the sun.

Potentially, exposure to any type of radiation can increase cancer risk, with higher exposure increasing the risk, Bouville said.

No increases in cancer rates were observed after the release of radioactive from a power plant on Three Mile Island, Pa., in 1979, Zablotska said.

Radiation sickness

A person's risk of getting sick depends on how much radiation the body absorbs. Those exposed to high levels of radiation, about 200 rem, (2000 millisievert ) could develop radiation sickness, Bouville said. A chest X-ray is about 0.02 rem, (0.2 millisieverts mSv), according to the Interational Atomic Energy Agency.

People are exposed to about 0.24 rem (2.4 mSv) per year from natural background radiation in the environment, the IAEA says.

Radiation sickness is often fatal and can produce such symptoms as bleeding and shedding of the lining on the gastrointestinal tract, Zablotska said. About 140 people suffered from it as a result of the Chernobyl accident, Zablotska said.

A radiation dose of 40 rem, (400 mSv) per hour was reported at one of the Japanese power plants at one point following the March 11 earthquakes and tsunami that damaged their cooling systems, according to the IAEA. This is a high dose but was isolated to a single location, the IAEA says.

"That is definitely an area where you do not want to stay for prolonged period," Higley said. She notes that a total dose of 400 to 600 rem can be lethal. But the radiation levels have been decreasing after the observed spike, she said. She speculates the spike may have been due to the release of a puff of radioactive material when pressure dropped at the facility.

Follow MyHealthNewsDaily staff writer Rachael Rettner on Twitter @RachaelRettner.

This story was provided by MyHealthNewsDaily, a sister site to LiveScience.

How Is Radiation Exposure Measured?

A more sophisticated measure of radiation exposure, called the effective dose, accounts for the harmfulness of the specific type of radiation present. While the effective and absorbed doses are the same for beta and gamma radiation, for alpha and neutron radiation – types that are especially dangerous for the human body – the effective dose has a larger value than the absorbed dose. A measure of the effective dose therefore gives a concrete scale for determining how dangerous an incident of exposure actually is. Units of effective dose are the "roentgen equivalent man" (rem) and the sievert (Sv), where one Sv equals 100 rem.

An average person receives an effective dose of 0.36 rem every year, 80 percent of which comes from natural sources of radiation, such as radioactive materials in the Earth's crust and mantle and sources in outer space. The remaining 20 percent of an average person's effective dose results from exposure to artificial radiation sources, such as X-ray machines, industrial smoke detectors, and continuing fallout from nuclear weapons tests.

In the United States, the NRC limits occupational radiation exposure to adults working with radioactive material to 5 rem per year. The limit can be raised to 25 rem when there's an emergency; that level is still not considered dangerous.

Radiation levels at Fukushima shot up to 0.8 rem per hour after an explosion at one of the nuclear reactors earlier today (March 15). If emergency workers had not been evacuated shortly afterward, they would have gotten their yearly occupational dosage in just over 6 hours.

Though potentially dangerous, that amount still would not have been lethal. According to the NRC, "[It] is generally believed that humans exposed to about 500 rem of radiation all at once will likely die without medical treatment. Similarly, a single dose of 100 rem may cause a person to experience nausea or skin reddening (although recovery is likely), and about 25 rem can cause temporary sterility in men. However, if these doses are spread out over time, instead of being delivered all at once, their effects tend to be less severe."


CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

INSTALACIJE U KUĆI UDRUGA HCOIE


HRVATSKI CENTAR OBNOVLJIVIH IZVORA ENERGIJE


INSTALACIJE U KUĆI

VODOVODNE INSTALACIJE


Vodovodne instalacije u nekoj građevini služe za dobavu pitke vode zadovoljavajuće kakvoće, uz odgovarajući tlak i u potrebnim količinama do svih mjesta potrošnje: slavina ili raznih uređaja. Uključuju cjevovode, armaturu, trošila i uređaje koji služe prolasku, spremanju, obradi i potrošnji pitke vode. Zahtjevi koji se na njih postavljaju određeni su propisima i normama, a za označavanje pojedinih njezinih dijelova služe grafički simboli.

Za izradu dijelova vodovodnih instalacija smiju se koristiti samo materijali koji nikako ne mogu utjecati na kakvoću vode i njezinu higijensku ispravnost, dok sami dijelovi trebaju biti priznate i potvrđene kakvoće, s trajno vidljivim oznakama proizvoda, njegovih značajki i proizvođača.

S obzirom na izvedbu opskrbe toplom vodom, vodovodne instalacije mogu biti:
◦sa središnjom pripremom (zagrijavanjem) potrošne tople vode i cirkulacijskim vodovima (tzv. centralna priprema PTV-a)
◦s pripremom potrošne tople vode uz mjesto potrošnje (tzv. decentralna priprema PTV-a).

Pri izvođenju kućnih vodovodnih instalacija valja voditi računa o nekoliko osnovnih smjernica:
◦cjevovode treba voditi pregledno, a njihovu namjenu označiti privjescima, naljepnicama ili bojom
◦cjevovodi se ne smiju pričvršćivati na druge instalacije ni obratno
◦pri polaganju cjevovoda treba spriječiti mogućnost stvaranja zračnih jastuka
◦kod izvođenja priključka na savitljivu cijev (tzv. gumeno ili plastično crijevo), trebalo bi ga opremiti zapornom armaturom s protupovratnim ventilom i odzračnikom
◦cjevovodi koji se rijetko koriste ili kod kojih postoji opasnost od smrzavanja trebaju se opremiti zapornom i armaturom za pražnjenje
◦potrošna topla voda ne smije se koristiti kao ogrjevni medij sustava grijanja, već sustavi grijanja i pripreme potrošne tople vode moraju biti odvojeni
◦cjevovode treba voditi pregledno, a njihovu namjenu označiti privjescima, naljepnicama ili bojom
◦nadžbukno položeni cjevovodi moraju se postavljati na odgovarajuću udaljenost od zidova, podova i ostalih instalacija
◦svaki razvod po katu ili po stanu trebao bi se izvesti neovisno o ostalim katovima ili stanovima, odnosno treba ga razdvojiti od glavnog usponskog ili vodoravnog razvoda trebao zapornim elementom
◦odvojak razvoda kata ili stana trebao bi biti postavljen najmanje 300 mm iznad očekivane razine najvišeg postavljenog trošila u tom stanu ili katu za sprječavanje povratnog strujanja
◦obijanje (tzv. štemanje) kanala u zidu kako bi se u njih naknadno ugradile instalacije nije dopušteno
◦glavni okomiti (usponski) vod treba biti opremljen zapornom i armaturom za pražnjenje i mora biti dostupan u svako vrijeme.


Kućna vodovodna instalacija

Kućni kanalizacijski sustavi ili kućna kanalizacija služi za odvođenje sanitarnih otpadnih voda (iz stambenih i poslovnih zgrada te manjih pogona). Započinju na izljevu sanitarnog elementa ili kućanskog uređaja (npr. perilicom rublja ili posuđa i sl), a završavaju na spoju s javnim kanalizacijskim sustavom, odnosno s kućnim sustavom za brinjavanje otpadne vode ako zgrada nije priključena na javnu kanalizaciju.

U osnovne dijelove kućnih kanalizacijskih sustava ubrajaju se:
◦priključni vodovi na izljev sanitarnog elementa ili kućanskog uređaja
◦vodoravni sabirni priključni vodovi (za priključak na više izljeva)
◦vodoravni sabirni vodovi
◦okomiti vodovi
◦glavni vodoravni sabirni vod (u najdonjem dijelu zgrade)
◦odzračni vodovi
◦sustav za odvodnju oborinske vode (vodoravni i okomiti oluci)
◦kućni priključak na javni kanalizacijski ili vlastiti sustav zbrinjavanja otpadne vode.

Za razliku od vodovodnih, protok se u kanalizacijskim instalacijama ostvaruje na osnovi djelovanja gravitacije pa su cjevovodi vodom ispunjeni uglavnom samo za vrijeme ispiranja. Kako je zbog toga u cjevovodima stalno prisutan zrak, potrebno je izvesti odzračne vodove kojima se s jedne strane omogućava prozračivanje cijele instalacije (i odvođenje neugodnih mirisa), a s druge strane izjednačavanje tlaka.

U kućne kanalizacijske instalacije, osim cjevovoda i pripadajućih elemenata, još se ubraja i razna dodatna oprema: uređaji za sprječavanje povrata strujanja, crpke za ostvarenje potrebne visine dobave kada su dijelovi sustava ispod razine javne kanalizacije, uređaji za pročišćavanje otpadne vode te septičke ili sabirne jame.

DIMOVODNE INSTALACIJE


Dimovodna instalacija je sustav koji služi za odvod dimnih plinova od ložišta izvora topline sustava grijanja (kotla, plinske grijalice, kamina itd) u okolicu, a njezini osnovni dijelovi su:
◦ložište izvora topline
◦dimovodni nastavak - dio ložišta koji povezuje ložište i spojnu dimovodnu cijev
◦spojna dimovodna cijev - spoj ložišta od dimovodnog nastavka do priključka na dimnjak
◦priključak na dimnjak - dio dimnjaka koji povezuje spojnu dimovodnu cijev s dimnjakom.
◦dimnjak - okomiti kanal u zgradi ili izvan nje koji se sastoji od nosive konstrukcije s jednom ili više unutarnjih cijevi za protok dimnih plinova
◦oprema - dijelovi namijenjeni za održavanje, regulaciju i ostvarenje sigurnog pogona: ◦osigurač strujanja
◦uređaj za dovod dodatnog zraka (regulator podtlaka)
◦dimna zaklopka
◦eksplozijska zaklopka
◦otvori za kontrolu i čišćenje
◦otvor za ispust kondenzata s posudom za neutralizaciju (kod kondenzacijskih kotlova)
◦sapnica
◦kapa na vrhu dimnjaka i sl.


U osnovne zadatke dimovodnih instalacija ubraja se neometano odvođenje dimnih plinova u okolicu, sprječavanje nekontroliranog ulaska opasnih dimnih plinova u prostoriju, onemogućavanje nekontroliranog izlaska štetnog kondenzata i stvaranje podtlaka koji je potreban za savladavanje otpora u ložištu, dimovodnoj cijevi i dimnjaku (kod primjene atmosferskih ložišta). Načelo rada dimovodne instalacije temelji se na razlici gustoće vanjskog zraka i dimnih plinova.

KLIMATIZACIJA I VENTILACIJA

Pod pojmom klimatizacije prema većini odrednica podrazumijevaju se procesi pripreme i razvođenja zraka kako bi se postigla ugodnost u zatvorenim, stambenim ili radnim prostorijama (tzv. komforna primjena), odnosno zadovoljili tehnološki zahtjevi proizvodnog procesa (tzv. tehnološka primjena). Pri tome se sustavno djeluje na temperaturu (grijanje i hlađenje), vlažnost (ovlaživanje i odvlaživanje) te kakvoću, odnosno kemijsku i mehaničku čistoću zraka (prisilna izmjena zraka i filtriranje). Iako prema spomenutoj odrednici treba djelovati na sve parametre, u svakodnevnom se govoru izraz klimatizacija koristi, primjerice, samo za hlađenje zraka u prostoriji, premda se svi ostali parametri drugačije ostvaruju (npr. grijanje radijatorima, a ventilacija prirodnim putem). Sustavi ventilacije i klimatizacije mogu se podijeliti na više načina:
1. prema prijenosniku energije:sustavi samo sa zrakomsustavi s vodom i zrakom2. prema smještaju sustava pripreme zraka s izvorima toplinskog i rashladnog učina:centralni sustavi ventilacije i klimatizacijelokalni sustavi klimatizacije (ne i ventilacije)3. prema području primjene:komforni sustavi: u stambenim, uredskim i javnim zgradama, ugostiteljskim objektima i sl. (pri čemu je osnovni zadatak ostvarivanje osjećaja ugodnosti kod osoba)industrijski sustavi: u raznim proizvodnim pogonima (pri čemu je, osim ostvarivanja osjećaja ugodnosti kod osoba koje u tim prostorima borave, zadatak i ispunjavanje određenih zahtjeva radnog procesa)4. prema izvedbi hlađenja zraka:sustavi s izravnim (direktnim) hlađenjem: toplina između zraka koji se priprema i radne tvari izmjenjuje se neposredno, što se najčešće koristi kod lokalnih sustava, iako je moguće i kod centralnih sustavi s neizravnim (indirektnim) hlađenjem: toplina između zraka koji se priprema i radne tvari izmjenjuje se posredno, odnosno koristi se dodatni medij kao prijenosnik topline (u pravilu voda), što se najčešće koristi u centralnim sustavima 5. prema načinu odvođenja topline kondenzacije, odnosno načinu hlađenja kondenzatora u rashladnom uređaju:sustavi sa zrakom hlađenim kondenzatorom: za odvođenje topline koristi se zrak (gotovo besplatna energija iz okolice), čime se postiže visoka učinkovitost, što se koristi i u centralnim i u lokalnim sustavimasustavi s vodom hlađenim kondenzatorom: za odvođenje topline koristi se voda (termodinamički iznimno povoljno), ali proces zahtijeva veliku količinu vode koja (za razliku od zraka) u pravilu nije besplatna pa najčešće dolaze u kombinaciji s rashladnim tornjevima, što se koristi samo kod centralnih sustava (kondenzator pri tome može biti i u izdvojenom kućištu).
Uz to, valja spomenuti i podjelu malih klima-uređaja:
◦kompaktni uređaji: svi sastavni dijelovi uređaja nalaze se u zajedničkom kućištu
◦split sustavi: postoje barem dva kućišta, tj. dvije odvojene jedinice.

HRVATSKI CENTAR OBNOVLJIVIH IZVORA ENERGIJE ( HCOIE )

Monday, March 14, 2011

WAVE ENERGY by CCRES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

WAVE ENERGY







Wave energy is produced when electricity generators are placed on the surface of the ocean. The energy provided is most often used in desalination plants, power plants and water pumps. Energy output is determined by wave height, wave speed, wavelength, and water density. To date there are only a handful of experimental wave generator plants in operation around the world. The articles on this page explore the world of wave energy and its possible applications.



Wave energy is among the impressive list of renewable energy resources that is being developed in the United States. New Jersey-based developer, Ocean Power Technologies has launched a project that features the nation’s first commercial wave power farm off the coast of Reedsport, Oregon. Once the project is completed, wave energy will generate power for several hundred homes in Oregon. The wave power farm operates on the wave energy that is created when a float on a buoy flows with the natural up and down movement of the waves.



This action subsequently causes an attached plunger to follow the same kind of ebb and flow movement. The plunger is attached to a hydraulic pump that changes the vertical movement to a circular motion, which drives an electric generator to produce electricity that is sent to shore through submerged cables.

When the initial project is finished, the first $4 million dollar buoy will measure 150 feet tall by 40 feet wide, weighing 200 tons. Nine more of these crafts will be set in motion by the year 2012 for a total cost of $60 million dollars. About four hundred homes will receive electricity from Oregon’s wave power farm by the completion of the project.



The wave energy project has promising potential, but has encountered some degree of skepticism and is faced with several areas of concern. One factor is that wave power is still in the early stages of development and is rather costly, running about five or six times more than wind power. Secondly, many people question how the buoys can be stabilized in the water to gather the energy from wave power. Another concerning factor is that waves are so unpredictable, and the size of the waves could result in either equipment damage of lack of cost effectiveness.

The wave power farm is a developing renewable energy source that could potentially compete with wind and solar energy, although it has had a bit of a shaky start. The first commercial wave power farm was developed in Portugal in 2008, but the project was suspended indefinitely last year for financial reasons. In addition, a wave-powered technology that was developed by a Canadian company sank off the Oregon coast two years ago.



The Oregon wave power farm is being funded by several sources, including Oregon tax credits, Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative and the U.S. Department of Energy.



The wave power farm concept has a great deal of promise and there are other projects around the world that are being developed in Spain, Scotland, Western Australia and off the coast of Cornwall, England. In the United States, Oregon Power Technologies is developing a wave power technology program in Hawaii in conjunction with the U.S. Navy.

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Sunday, March 13, 2011

BREAKING JAPAN DISASTER NEWS by CCRES



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES



BREAKING JAPAN DISASTER NEWS


The Federation of Electric Power Companies offers a list of Japan’s nuclear plants including the locations and the specifications of each. In 1952, Japan’s nine major electric power companies established the FEPC to promote smooth operations within the industry. View map.

According to the FEPC, there are currently 55 operating nuclear power plants in Japan. The ten FEPC member companies own and operate 52 Light Water Reactors (LWR). Three more LWRs are operated by the private company Japan Atomic Power Corporation (JAPC). The Monju Fast Breeder Reactor is run by the semi-governmental organization Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC).

With the radiation level continuing to rise at the nuclear power plant in Fukushima, news has come in that the United States has sent coolant for the nuclear plant where the cooling system has failed.



‘It’s a really scary race against time,’ said Robert Alvarez, an expert on nuclear power and a former top official in the U.S. Department of Energy.

Problems have cropped up at the nuclear plant after an 8.9-magnitude earthquake shook Japan on Friday afternoon. Around 3,000 people living in the vicinity of the nuclear plant have already been evacuated amid fears of a radioactive leak.

Meanwhile, the plant’s operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Co, has announced that the air pressure inside one of the reactors has also been rising. The company has already undertaken a ‘normal procedure’ of releasing ‘a little’ air in order to release some of the pressure built-up. According to experts this is a normal procedure carried out during such circumstances.

Concerns have already been raised regarding the overall safety of nuclear power as news came in that the electrical system that supplies the plant’s emergency cooling system has also failed. The radioactive core needs continued cooling to prevent a meltdown.

Mobile power supplies have now arrived at the plant to restore the system, which had been operating on batteries.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has said that the U.S. Air Force in Japan had also transported coolant to the plant.

According to Alvarez, the earthquake has probably caused damage to the infrastructure that supplies water to the plant. An inability to get water pumped into the reactor within about a 24-hour period could result in severe consequences, including a possible meltdown of the reactor’s core, he added.

Two other Japanese power plants had reported fires in non-nuclear areas earlier Friday, but both were extinguished within a few hours.

After the explosion at the Fukushima nuclear power plant, Japan is now in a race to prevent meltdowns at its other nuclear power plants, declaring a state of emergency at five atomic reactors and evacuating thousands of residents, as it launched a mammoth relief operation in its northeast devastated by a massive earthquake that has likely left over 1,000 people dead.






In Fukushima Prefecture, there are already reports that radiation 1,000 times above normal has been detected in the control room of one nuclear plant, although officials said that levels outside its gates were only eight times above normal and asserted that were no health hazards as of now. However, status of this is unclear as of yet after the recent explosion at the nuclear plant.

The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency has said that it has already issued an unprecedented order for the electricity firm running the atomic unit to open a valve at the plant to release pressure in the container housing the reactor following the powerful earthquake.

The local government, acting on orders from Prime Minister Naoto Kan, also instructed over 3,000 residents living within a 10-kilometer radius of the No. 1 nuclear plant in the region and within a 3-kilometer radius of the No. 2 plant to evacuate.

A state of emergency has just been declared at two reactors at Japan’s Daiichi and three units at its nearby Fukushima Daini site.

The growing risk of significant radiation leak at two Japanese nuclear power plants following the earthquake and tsunami is threatening to hurt an industry that has enjoyed a rebirth since the Three Mile Island accident in 1979 and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.

Following the disaster, nuclear power advocates and environmentalists have brought up familiar arguments over the incident. However, a wider public debate may be ignited if a major radiation leak occurs in Japan.

That debate has been largely muted since the 1980s when rock concerts were held to galvanize opposition to nuclear power after the Three Mile Island incident in Pennsylvania and the popular movie “The China Syndrome,” that raised awareness of the dangers of a nuclear reactor meltdown.

If there is a substantial radioactive release, there could even be questions about whether it could travel on the Pacific jet stream to the U.S. West Coast.

“It is serious and it could lead to a meltdown,” said Mark Hibbs, a nuclear expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “And what we’re seeing, barring any information from the Japanese that they have it under control, is that we’re headed in that direction.”

However, Naoto Sekimura of the University of Tokyo, has announced that a major radioactive disaster was not likely. The actual picture remains to be seen once the extent of the damage caused due to the explosion at the nuclear power plant.

An already turbulent energy market has been rocked by the 8.9 magnitude earthquake and tsunami that has rocked Japan and the entire Pacific region.



Refiners and LNG importers all across Asia are now being faced with the rising danger of volatile oil prices as the earthquake and the tsunami that ravaged parts of Japan, and fears of unrest in key oil exporters rock the energy market.

Japan is the third largest oil consumer in the world and the natural disaster that has hit the country is expected to temporarily disrupt fuel demand from factories, aircraft and even automobiles in Japan. Japan imports most of its energy requirements, while the country’s power is majorly generated from nuclear energy itself.

Following on from the disaster, Brent crude oil, which had soared to nearly $120 a barrel in recent weeks because of turmoil in North Africa and Middle East, came down to $112, while the benchmark US crude, WTI, fell below $100.

Because of the hit Japan’s nuclear power plants have taken from the natural disaster, most of the nuclear plants in the country have been shut down, forcing the gas-fired power stations in Japan to burn more fuel, including liquefied natural gas, in an attempt to offset the shortfall in electricity in world’s top LNG consumer.

The shutdown of nuclear plants has also increased the demand for liquid fuel. What’s more, the usage of diesel-fired equipment to clear the rubble after earthquakes in countries such as Iran and China in the past has boosted oil demand. Industry officials say that they are expecting demand swings, which can trigger sharp ups and downs in the oil market.

Meanwhile, LNG importers are closely tracking developments in international markets as the tsunami warnings have been issued in the Pacific Ocean. Taiwan, Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, Chile and Russia are among the countries where warnings have been issued. However, most of these areas have not suffered any heavy damages due to the tsunami. Industry officials say that last time a major earthquake struck Japan, LNG prices had doubled in the spot market.

“There are reports of nuclear power plant shut down in Japan that may fuel demands for LNG for electricity supplies in the crisis time. However, there are no reports of any accidents at nuclear power plants and hence we can expect them to start generation soon again,” Shell Hazira , MD Nitin Shukla said. “LNG prices depend on how soon energy machinery recovers from the calamity,” he said.

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )

Saturday, March 12, 2011

SAVE ENERGY by CCRES

CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES

SAVE ENERGY





CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES 8 CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )



CROATIAN CENTER of RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES ( CCRES )